you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

YouTube music is better than music on youtube, particularly for people with slow or capped internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Moderately, it's still not as good as Play Music it replaced, and frankly the only reason I use it is because it comes with Premium (and Lite gets ads so fuck that deal), otherwise I'd subscribe to something else for music (aside from growing my album collection on Bandcamp).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I heard good things about play music but I was super pov when that existed and didn't pay for any online stuff, it was piracy or nothing.

    Thats the exact same reason I have YouTube music.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    In the time it takes for a video to even show up, I can have a song playing with a playlist behind it. One video is the same amount of data as many songs.

    My phone is my home internet and is often under 100KB/s, even at 240p YouTube takes way longer than YouTube music.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    And it's better for people who want to listen to more than just a few songs, for people who need an organized collections, playlists, etc. In other words, for those who need a music streaming service. YouTube isn't one.

  • source
  • parent