The image is a meme featuring scenes from an animated show. It is divided into three panels:  1. Top Left Panel: Two characters are sitting in a red vehicle. The character in the passenger seat is wearing a red cap and sunglasses. The driver is looking out the window, and a third person is visible in the back seat. Text reads, "Is this the liberal death cult?"  2. Top Right Panel: A school bus is shown with a blonde character standing near it. The text says, "We're not a death cult. We just want to defeat fascism by maintaining the system that inevitably leads to it."  3. Bottom Panel: The same two characters from the first panel are in the vehicle. The character in the passenger seat looks forward, while the driver is looking at him. Text reads, "YEAH, THIS IS IT."
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

In this hypothetical also get to starve millions of people to death and your legacy gets to be sending out late night death squads to kill dissenters. Well, not you. You would never be in charge. You will never be Joseph Stalin, somebody else will be and you will suffer with the rest of the peasants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Millions of people routinely starved in pre-Soviet Russia and you don't seem to have a problem with it. Soviets ended hunger after WW2 through the mechanisation of agriculture, as all countries which eliminated hunger did. Suffering famines during civil wars, during Nazi invasion of your territory, and during mass collectivisation processes, isn't exclusive to the Soviet Union, it's a rather common thing in preindustrial societies as the Soviet Union was at that time. That's in opposition to England murdering many millions more of Indians in the Bengal famine during WW2 by purposefully extracting essentially all food from some regions of India.

    your legacy gets to be sending out late night death squads to kill dissenters

    Thats just, like, your opinion, dude. The legacy of the Soviet Union (a project much greater than a single man who was president for less than 3 decades of the project) saved Europe from Nazism (saving tens if not hundreds of millions of lives in the process), industrialised 300 million people without abusing colonialism and extraction of resources and labour from the global south, rose life expectancy from 28 years to 70, guaranteed free education to the highest level to all women and men of the country, produced the lowest historically recorded levels of inequality in the region, and eliminated homelessness and unemployment.

    Stop swallowing and spreading western anticommunist propaganda, the evil is the western empire oppressing billions in the global south, not a country that suffered famines during land collectivisation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (11 children)

    No that's not accurate. Centralized agricultural planning in pre-soviet Russia was still better than what the Soviets implemented, this was all very well documented that more people died as a result of the changes made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    Centralized agricultural planning in pre-soviet Russia was still better than what the Soviets implemented

    Life expectancy was 28 years old before the Bolsheviks, after the land reforms and WW2 life expectancy rose dramatically to 60, what on Earth are you talking about

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    In 1845 it was 29, in 1920 it was 25, in 1945 it was 23.

    They didnt beat 50 until the USSR had been around for 30 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    LMFAO you literally went to the first google link provides on "life expectancy of Russia historic", the Statista website, and purposefully cherrypicked the two lowest points in the history of the USSR, which coincide with wars they famously didn't start (first being the civil war, second being WW2).

    Why not pick 1930, the second year since land collectivization began, with the 37 years of life expectancy already (higher than at any point during Tsarism)? Why not pick 1940 with 41.5 years of life expectancy before Nazis invaded the USSR and murdered 27 million people?

    You're a fucking joke lmao trying to lie to yourself by cherrypicking the lowest values coinciding with wars imposed on the Soviet Union

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    isn' RSA better than aes? i thought aes' keyspace was only like 56 bits or something.

    edit: i looked it up. aes can take a 256 bit key. i was thinking of DES.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You responded to the wrong comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    People would have lived longer and healthier if the USSR hadnt starved them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Lmao keep trying, loser, you're just lying to yourself with your cherrypicking, not anyone else

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Uh no the stats hurt your feelies

    Po widdle baybee

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Loser, keep lying to yourself. You had done exactly 0 research on it, you went to the literal first google link and cherry picked the two data points that suited you. You probably didn't even know about the fucking Russian civil war, uneducated swine

  • source
  • parent