▲ 1589 ▼ Black Mirror AI (mander.xyz) submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 206 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] hedhoncho@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (13 children) Why are the photos all ugly biological things permalink fedilink source hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago They were generated using shitty AI models. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world -12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children) The reason you're seeing biological photos in AI articles lately is tied to a recent but underreported breakthrough in processor technology: bio-silicon hybrids. They’re early-stage biological processors that integrate living neural tissue with traditional silicon circuits. Several research labs, including one backed by DARPA and the University of Kyoto, have successfully grown functional neuron clusters that can perform pattern recognition tasks with far less energy than conventional chips. The biological cells react more collectively and with a higher success rate than the current systems. Think of it kind of how a computer itself is fast but parts can wear out (water cooled tubes or fan), whereas the biological cell systems will collectively react and if a few cells die, they may just create more. It's really a crazy complex and efficient breakthrough. The images of brains, neurons, or other organic forms aren't just symbolic anymore—they're literal. These bio-processors are being tested for edge computing, adaptive learning, and even ethical decision modeling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago The actual reason is that the use of biological photos is a design choice meant to visually bridge connect artificial intelligence and human intelligence. These random biological photos help to convey the idea that AI is inspired by or interacts with human cognition, emotions, or biology. It’s also a marketing tactic: people are more likely to engage with content that includes familiar, human-centered visuals. Though it doesn’t always reflect the technical content, it does help to make abstract or complex topics more relatable to a larger/extended audience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (2 children) I see what you-gpt did there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago I'm going to assume half of that comment is wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Some of it, yeah. I typed up the middle, then ran a separate prompt, and added to it. If you can see the edits, the original was organic and then the edit was adding to it permalink fedilink source parent [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago That’s… actually quite terrifying. The sci-fi concern over whether computers could ever be truly “alive” becomes a lot more tangible when literal living biological systems are implemented. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wait, what?! Like… biocomputers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's just bullshit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago For an AI model to scrape 😈 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Ive read a paper going of biological computing. Its a very real field of research. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago Of course it is, but the comment is LLM-derived drivel. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago I know what I'm going to try and research tomorrow. Also, we inch closer and closer to servitors every day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago They were generated using shitty AI models. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world -12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children) The reason you're seeing biological photos in AI articles lately is tied to a recent but underreported breakthrough in processor technology: bio-silicon hybrids. They’re early-stage biological processors that integrate living neural tissue with traditional silicon circuits. Several research labs, including one backed by DARPA and the University of Kyoto, have successfully grown functional neuron clusters that can perform pattern recognition tasks with far less energy than conventional chips. The biological cells react more collectively and with a higher success rate than the current systems. Think of it kind of how a computer itself is fast but parts can wear out (water cooled tubes or fan), whereas the biological cell systems will collectively react and if a few cells die, they may just create more. It's really a crazy complex and efficient breakthrough. The images of brains, neurons, or other organic forms aren't just symbolic anymore—they're literal. These bio-processors are being tested for edge computing, adaptive learning, and even ethical decision modeling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago The actual reason is that the use of biological photos is a design choice meant to visually bridge connect artificial intelligence and human intelligence. These random biological photos help to convey the idea that AI is inspired by or interacts with human cognition, emotions, or biology. It’s also a marketing tactic: people are more likely to engage with content that includes familiar, human-centered visuals. Though it doesn’t always reflect the technical content, it does help to make abstract or complex topics more relatable to a larger/extended audience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (2 children) I see what you-gpt did there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago I'm going to assume half of that comment is wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Some of it, yeah. I typed up the middle, then ran a separate prompt, and added to it. If you can see the edits, the original was organic and then the edit was adding to it permalink fedilink source parent [–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago That’s… actually quite terrifying. The sci-fi concern over whether computers could ever be truly “alive” becomes a lot more tangible when literal living biological systems are implemented. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wait, what?! Like… biocomputers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's just bullshit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago For an AI model to scrape 😈 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Ive read a paper going of biological computing. Its a very real field of research. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago Of course it is, but the comment is LLM-derived drivel. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago I know what I'm going to try and research tomorrow. Also, we inch closer and closer to servitors every day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago The actual reason is that the use of biological photos is a design choice meant to visually bridge connect artificial intelligence and human intelligence. These random biological photos help to convey the idea that AI is inspired by or interacts with human cognition, emotions, or biology. It’s also a marketing tactic: people are more likely to engage with content that includes familiar, human-centered visuals. Though it doesn’t always reflect the technical content, it does help to make abstract or complex topics more relatable to a larger/extended audience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (2 children) I see what you-gpt did there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago I'm going to assume half of that comment is wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Some of it, yeah. I typed up the middle, then ran a separate prompt, and added to it. If you can see the edits, the original was organic and then the edit was adding to it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago I'm going to assume half of that comment is wrong permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Some of it, yeah. I typed up the middle, then ran a separate prompt, and added to it. If you can see the edits, the original was organic and then the edit was adding to it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago That’s… actually quite terrifying. The sci-fi concern over whether computers could ever be truly “alive” becomes a lot more tangible when literal living biological systems are implemented. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wait, what?! Like… biocomputers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's just bullshit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago For an AI model to scrape 😈 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Ive read a paper going of biological computing. Its a very real field of research. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago Of course it is, but the comment is LLM-derived drivel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's just bullshit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago For an AI model to scrape 😈 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Ive read a paper going of biological computing. Its a very real field of research. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago Of course it is, but the comment is LLM-derived drivel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Ive read a paper going of biological computing. Its a very real field of research. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago Of course it is, but the comment is LLM-derived drivel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago Of course it is, but the comment is LLM-derived drivel. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago I know what I'm going to try and research tomorrow. Also, we inch closer and closer to servitors every day. permalink fedilink source parent