you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Not necessarily, with “genetic drift” random phenotypic changes can happen that have a neutral effect on fitness. So if they don’t need side-facing eyes, then this can just happen randomly. Especially if the sideways eyes are in some way “costly” to maintain

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    If sideways eyes are "costly" compared to forward facing eyes, then that would technically be a push for forward facing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Or goats just find forward facing eyes to be sexier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There was an interesting study done with zebra finches. In it they glued fake mohawkes on males and found that females selected them over unaltered males, even though it didn't naturally occur in the species. So there is some precedence for the possibility that the forward facing eyes were simply "sexier".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment