▲ 438 ▼ Duolingo CEO says AI is a better teacher than humans—but schools will exist ‘because you still need childcare’ (fortune.com) submitted 1 year ago by als@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world 232 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (9 children) So many rich psychopaths in capitalist societies. permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (8 children) The system is designed to make psychopaths successful and powerful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago (7 children) and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) which ones? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I think they were meaning the billionare class and they just phrased it very suspiciously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You could be right but I'd rather let 'em answer the question for themself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (8 children) The system is designed to make psychopaths successful and powerful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago (7 children) and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) which ones? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I think they were meaning the billionare class and they just phrased it very suspiciously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You could be right but I'd rather let 'em answer the question for themself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago (7 children) and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) which ones? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I think they were meaning the billionare class and they just phrased it very suspiciously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You could be right but I'd rather let 'em answer the question for themself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) which ones? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I think they were meaning the billionare class and they just phrased it very suspiciously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You could be right but I'd rather let 'em answer the question for themself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I think they were meaning the billionare class and they just phrased it very suspiciously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You could be right but I'd rather let 'em answer the question for themself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You could be right but I'd rather let 'em answer the question for themself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) I was meaning the wealthy and the cutthroat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) All good. Maybe just be a bit more specific next time so it doesn't sound like you're saying "(((minorities)))" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) is that not the term for a lesser part than the "majority"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Technically yes, but in the current political climate phrases like your initial one are frequently said by right wing wackos to alude to various protected classes indirectly. For example. With your initial comment and as such the system is beneficial to minorities (specific ones, not all). The first thing that pops into my head isn't billionares, it's alex jones ranting about "the jews" and "the world order", because the way you wrote that comment had a lot in common with the way those people talk when they're trying to not say the quiet part out loud. permalink fedilink source parent