▲ 1394 ▼ Everything wants me to pay rent (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 204 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) Nah, absolutely not. Putting a profit incentive on the news is how we end up with how the news currently is - reaction-bait with the sole purpose of driving engagement and views to generate ad revenue, instead of actual, unbiased, honest journalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago I wouldn't say it was just that. News also got worse on e.g. government supported TV channels in countries that have them. Part of the problem is the regurgitation of social media on the news and also news organizations being afraid of social media backlash. Another part is politicians not giving interviews to organizations that ask them hard questions, that one was probably better in the past because there were more limited numbers of news sources. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) If you want narrow readership. Or a society that bases its current events knowledge almost strictly on headlines instead of article content. People can’t afford groceries. Rent. There is a profound increase in garbage both along highways and in rural locations because it’s the first utility to be sacrificed in the name of survival. Paying $x per month to dig deeper in on a headline, while the above is happening, isn’t going to occur on any grand scale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago I agree. But you can’t squeeze blood from a rock. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Goretantath@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gatekeeping the news? No ty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago Do you think the news just appears on webpages for us to consume? Particularly in the case of investigative journalism, there is a skill involved in writing the stories, and it consumes the time and effort of many people. Charging money for your work is not "gatekeeping." It's how you keep eating. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) Nah, absolutely not. Putting a profit incentive on the news is how we end up with how the news currently is - reaction-bait with the sole purpose of driving engagement and views to generate ad revenue, instead of actual, unbiased, honest journalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago I wouldn't say it was just that. News also got worse on e.g. government supported TV channels in countries that have them. Part of the problem is the regurgitation of social media on the news and also news organizations being afraid of social media backlash. Another part is politicians not giving interviews to organizations that ask them hard questions, that one was probably better in the past because there were more limited numbers of news sources. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago I wouldn't say it was just that. News also got worse on e.g. government supported TV channels in countries that have them. Part of the problem is the regurgitation of social media on the news and also news organizations being afraid of social media backlash. Another part is politicians not giving interviews to organizations that ask them hard questions, that one was probably better in the past because there were more limited numbers of news sources. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago I wouldn't say it was just that. News also got worse on e.g. government supported TV channels in countries that have them. Part of the problem is the regurgitation of social media on the news and also news organizations being afraid of social media backlash. Another part is politicians not giving interviews to organizations that ask them hard questions, that one was probably better in the past because there were more limited numbers of news sources. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) If you want narrow readership. Or a society that bases its current events knowledge almost strictly on headlines instead of article content. People can’t afford groceries. Rent. There is a profound increase in garbage both along highways and in rural locations because it’s the first utility to be sacrificed in the name of survival. Paying $x per month to dig deeper in on a headline, while the above is happening, isn’t going to occur on any grand scale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago I agree. But you can’t squeeze blood from a rock. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago I agree. But you can’t squeeze blood from a rock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago I agree. But you can’t squeeze blood from a rock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Gatekeeping the news? No ty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago Do you think the news just appears on webpages for us to consume? Particularly in the case of investigative journalism, there is a skill involved in writing the stories, and it consumes the time and effort of many people. Charging money for your work is not "gatekeeping." It's how you keep eating. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago Do you think the news just appears on webpages for us to consume? Particularly in the case of investigative journalism, there is a skill involved in writing the stories, and it consumes the time and effort of many people. Charging money for your work is not "gatekeeping." It's how you keep eating. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent