▲ 879 ▼ Ha! Sadly so often true (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by LadyButterfly@lemmy.world to c/witchesvspatriarchy@lemmy.ca 169 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (6 children) Well yes, because there would be no human race at all. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Women could clone each other. Also 'no men' probably doesn't exclude all people capable of providing sperm. So I think if they were to mysteriously disappear we'd be ok. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) While speaking about this theoretical scenario, have you ever thought that men exist for their own sake, in their own world, and don't care about what you would like. Maybe if enough people get together, we can build an entirely segregated society so that we never meet again. That would be perfect, because we don't exist for you, and many of us don't care about you, and have no reason to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) To be honest I did kind of forget about people's will to live. But in this theoretical scenario I also don't see how it's relevant. It's not like I implied we intentionally remove men from this world. The way I described it nobody had a choice in the matter. I never said it was good not to have men, just that it's possible to live without them which was denied by the original statement I replied to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago Yesn't it's complicated. But yeah, it's possible in theory. But having children in this world in the first place is also unethical. You are forcing a new human to into a post-empathy world, where they will be exploited ruthlessly, only for AI to just replace them, and leave them to die through no fault of their own. permalink fedilink source parent [–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Women don't need men to reproduce. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago If you believe the virgin Mary... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Women could clone each other. Also 'no men' probably doesn't exclude all people capable of providing sperm. So I think if they were to mysteriously disappear we'd be ok. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) While speaking about this theoretical scenario, have you ever thought that men exist for their own sake, in their own world, and don't care about what you would like. Maybe if enough people get together, we can build an entirely segregated society so that we never meet again. That would be perfect, because we don't exist for you, and many of us don't care about you, and have no reason to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) To be honest I did kind of forget about people's will to live. But in this theoretical scenario I also don't see how it's relevant. It's not like I implied we intentionally remove men from this world. The way I described it nobody had a choice in the matter. I never said it was good not to have men, just that it's possible to live without them which was denied by the original statement I replied to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago Yesn't it's complicated. But yeah, it's possible in theory. But having children in this world in the first place is also unethical. You are forcing a new human to into a post-empathy world, where they will be exploited ruthlessly, only for AI to just replace them, and leave them to die through no fault of their own. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) While speaking about this theoretical scenario, have you ever thought that men exist for their own sake, in their own world, and don't care about what you would like. Maybe if enough people get together, we can build an entirely segregated society so that we never meet again. That would be perfect, because we don't exist for you, and many of us don't care about you, and have no reason to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) To be honest I did kind of forget about people's will to live. But in this theoretical scenario I also don't see how it's relevant. It's not like I implied we intentionally remove men from this world. The way I described it nobody had a choice in the matter. I never said it was good not to have men, just that it's possible to live without them which was denied by the original statement I replied to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago Yesn't it's complicated. But yeah, it's possible in theory. But having children in this world in the first place is also unethical. You are forcing a new human to into a post-empathy world, where they will be exploited ruthlessly, only for AI to just replace them, and leave them to die through no fault of their own. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) To be honest I did kind of forget about people's will to live. But in this theoretical scenario I also don't see how it's relevant. It's not like I implied we intentionally remove men from this world. The way I described it nobody had a choice in the matter. I never said it was good not to have men, just that it's possible to live without them which was denied by the original statement I replied to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago Yesn't it's complicated. But yeah, it's possible in theory. But having children in this world in the first place is also unethical. You are forcing a new human to into a post-empathy world, where they will be exploited ruthlessly, only for AI to just replace them, and leave them to die through no fault of their own. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago Yesn't it's complicated. But yeah, it's possible in theory. But having children in this world in the first place is also unethical. You are forcing a new human to into a post-empathy world, where they will be exploited ruthlessly, only for AI to just replace them, and leave them to die through no fault of their own. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Women don't need men to reproduce. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago If you believe the virgin Mary... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago If you believe the virgin Mary... permalink fedilink source parent