you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nothing wrong with speaking from experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I would really appreciate this twisted timeline we're in featuring the Clintons openly acknowledging that they know how corruption works from experience as a way to derail the current corruption train that we're all tied down in front of. The writers need to demonstrate that they haven't completely lost the plot or I'm cancelling my subscription

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    She also received money (@ least a million) from Qatar while in office.

    She failed to report it, admitted it after being called out. It was part of the ridiculous show that won him the election.

    She's the worst person to open her mouth about this, as she's directly guilty and tried to hide it.

    Not 400 million, but a direct comparison with Qatar can be made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ah, the Russian bots are working overtime today to distract the left from talking about trump again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago*

    We don't really need to talk about Trump's corruption. We all know he's corrupt and none of us are arguing about it.

    But when the person who was so corrupt she couldn't win an election against the orange buffoon starts inserting herself into the conversation, accounts like yours come out of the woodwork to defend her using stale 2016 rhetoric. If there are fake accounts here, I'm pretty sure it's yours.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Truly, there is nothing like sitting in midwest america in trump land and being called a russian bot. @Sillyglow@lemmy.ca I realize a nuanced view is difficult for many.

    Should I insult you before I finish replying?

    Is posting a fact about the 2016 election, and Hillary Clinton somehow disinformation?

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/oct/16/mike-pence/did-qatar-promise-clinton-foundation-1-million-fiv/

    My point was, that the turd is being a hypocrite, in that part of his campaign in 2016 was capitalizing on her errors in failing to report external country lobbying.

    There's strong evidence to point to Hillary being wrong here and very much the orange turd. Two things can be true.

    I'm not trying to what about the facts.

    Someone posted a screenshot of her top contributors.

    I recently watched a video discussing the jet, which played clips of him arguing against her doing the same thing he's defending. I looked into it and found https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/13/trump-plane-qatar-comments/

    As I noted in my statement which you replied to - It's not exactly the same, but comparable.

    If anyone wonders why I would even try, please be aware of this adage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments