▲ 234 ▼ Kids born today are going to grow up in a hellscape, grim climate study finds (www.livescience.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 38 points 1 year ago (8 children) Oh thank goodness, my youngest was born a year ago permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (7 children) mine was born yesterday, phew! imagine if they were born a day later! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Congratulations (if this isn't a joke)!!! I'd love to help make the world habitable for your child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago no I'm never having kids unless the world somehow fixes itself and somehow guarantees it'll stay that way for more than a few seconds. permalink fedilink source parent [+] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Putting that third understates it, having kids is the worst thing a person can do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk? If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced. EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (7 children) mine was born yesterday, phew! imagine if they were born a day later! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Congratulations (if this isn't a joke)!!! I'd love to help make the world habitable for your child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago no I'm never having kids unless the world somehow fixes itself and somehow guarantees it'll stay that way for more than a few seconds. permalink fedilink source parent [+] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Putting that third understates it, having kids is the worst thing a person can do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk? If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced. EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Congratulations (if this isn't a joke)!!! I'd love to help make the world habitable for your child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago no I'm never having kids unless the world somehow fixes itself and somehow guarantees it'll stay that way for more than a few seconds. permalink fedilink source parent [+] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Putting that third understates it, having kids is the worst thing a person can do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk? If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced. EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago no I'm never having kids unless the world somehow fixes itself and somehow guarantees it'll stay that way for more than a few seconds. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Putting that third understates it, having kids is the worst thing a person can do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk? If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced. EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Putting that third understates it, having kids is the worst thing a person can do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk? If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced. EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk? If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced. EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person. permalink fedilink source parent