you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

doesn’t convince me it can’t be true

That sounds like backwards logic - you're postulating guilt based on the lack of evidence of innocence (if I'm understanding your point correctly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    You're not. I'm not saying he's guilty. I'm just saying that it's silly to imply there's a conspiracy or something just because some of his alleged actions seem abnormal, when cherry-picking which of his actions you're looking at.

  • source
  • parent