▲ 2694 ▼ Firefox is the only way. (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by Spudwart@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml 359 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 3 years ago (10 children) Not a good idea if Google be pulling some shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] deus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago (9 children) Yeah, it's weird for them to rely on Google considering how hard Valve has worked to make Steam independent from MS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago It probably doesn't matter for what they do. There isn't really much need for an ad blocker on a browser that's going to a store page which is essentially an ad for a product in and of itself. A steam user actually wants that store page to load, why would there be a need for a store page? And they could transition to something else if Google does something that affects them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 years ago (5 children) Chromium isn't technically Google permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 years ago Still serves googles goal of control over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 3 years ago It's maintained by Google, which is pretty much the same thing - in the end, they get to decide what features get implemented and what doesn't make the cut. Sure we can fork it, and we can make our own, but in the end as long as their code is the main base, they have a lot of control over all the different forks, as usually the forks will have to keep rebasing their code off of new updates to stay as secure and up to date as possible. permalink fedilink source parent [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) It is, good luck hard forking such a huge codebase. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I mean what would stop a company from doing that? I get why they don't, because a lot of changes and fixes get implemented into the code from various companies/individuals, but if you had enough manpower and money, it could be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think it's too weird. So many apps today are just Chromium wrappers. It's just easier to use a premade base, plus you don't have to develop the web and desktop version independently, they can literally be the same code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BeardedGingerWonder@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago While that's fairly typical and good practice in dev circles, we're talking about a company that's single handedly elevated an entire OS to prevent a big company taking too much power. I think the key here is they don't really compete with Google. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago (9 children) Yeah, it's weird for them to rely on Google considering how hard Valve has worked to make Steam independent from MS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago It probably doesn't matter for what they do. There isn't really much need for an ad blocker on a browser that's going to a store page which is essentially an ad for a product in and of itself. A steam user actually wants that store page to load, why would there be a need for a store page? And they could transition to something else if Google does something that affects them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 years ago (5 children) Chromium isn't technically Google permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 years ago Still serves googles goal of control over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 3 years ago It's maintained by Google, which is pretty much the same thing - in the end, they get to decide what features get implemented and what doesn't make the cut. Sure we can fork it, and we can make our own, but in the end as long as their code is the main base, they have a lot of control over all the different forks, as usually the forks will have to keep rebasing their code off of new updates to stay as secure and up to date as possible. permalink fedilink source parent [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) It is, good luck hard forking such a huge codebase. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I mean what would stop a company from doing that? I get why they don't, because a lot of changes and fixes get implemented into the code from various companies/individuals, but if you had enough manpower and money, it could be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think it's too weird. So many apps today are just Chromium wrappers. It's just easier to use a premade base, plus you don't have to develop the web and desktop version independently, they can literally be the same code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BeardedGingerWonder@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago While that's fairly typical and good practice in dev circles, we're talking about a company that's single handedly elevated an entire OS to prevent a big company taking too much power. I think the key here is they don't really compete with Google. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 years ago It probably doesn't matter for what they do. There isn't really much need for an ad blocker on a browser that's going to a store page which is essentially an ad for a product in and of itself. A steam user actually wants that store page to load, why would there be a need for a store page? And they could transition to something else if Google does something that affects them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 years ago (5 children) Chromium isn't technically Google permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 years ago Still serves googles goal of control over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 3 years ago It's maintained by Google, which is pretty much the same thing - in the end, they get to decide what features get implemented and what doesn't make the cut. Sure we can fork it, and we can make our own, but in the end as long as their code is the main base, they have a lot of control over all the different forks, as usually the forks will have to keep rebasing their code off of new updates to stay as secure and up to date as possible. permalink fedilink source parent [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) It is, good luck hard forking such a huge codebase. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I mean what would stop a company from doing that? I get why they don't, because a lot of changes and fixes get implemented into the code from various companies/individuals, but if you had enough manpower and money, it could be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 years ago Still serves googles goal of control over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 3 years ago It's maintained by Google, which is pretty much the same thing - in the end, they get to decide what features get implemented and what doesn't make the cut. Sure we can fork it, and we can make our own, but in the end as long as their code is the main base, they have a lot of control over all the different forks, as usually the forks will have to keep rebasing their code off of new updates to stay as secure and up to date as possible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) It is, good luck hard forking such a huge codebase. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I mean what would stop a company from doing that? I get why they don't, because a lot of changes and fixes get implemented into the code from various companies/individuals, but if you had enough manpower and money, it could be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I mean what would stop a company from doing that? I get why they don't, because a lot of changes and fixes get implemented into the code from various companies/individuals, but if you had enough manpower and money, it could be done. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Exaclly money and manpower. Noone is going to do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think it's too weird. So many apps today are just Chromium wrappers. It's just easier to use a premade base, plus you don't have to develop the web and desktop version independently, they can literally be the same code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BeardedGingerWonder@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago While that's fairly typical and good practice in dev circles, we're talking about a company that's single handedly elevated an entire OS to prevent a big company taking too much power. I think the key here is they don't really compete with Google. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago While that's fairly typical and good practice in dev circles, we're talking about a company that's single handedly elevated an entire OS to prevent a big company taking too much power. I think the key here is they don't really compete with Google. permalink fedilink source parent