▲ 796 ▼ I bet it's an engineering marvel though. (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works 81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) What am I looking at? The white dot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) The oval beige thing that takes up 1/5th of the width of the screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It is 10km wide? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagger_293 Also, I don't see any beige oval that takes up 20% of the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago That wiki link shows the measurement of the bagger 293. 225m length is 2.25% of that 10km. The 46m wide is 0.46% of 10km. You will not spot that with naked human eye in space, it would be a speck. Plus you circled the mine, not the excavator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) The oval beige thing that takes up 1/5th of the width of the screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It is 10km wide? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagger_293 Also, I don't see any beige oval that takes up 20% of the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago That wiki link shows the measurement of the bagger 293. 225m length is 2.25% of that 10km. The 46m wide is 0.46% of 10km. You will not spot that with naked human eye in space, it would be a speck. Plus you circled the mine, not the excavator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) It is 10km wide? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagger_293 Also, I don't see any beige oval that takes up 20% of the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago That wiki link shows the measurement of the bagger 293. 225m length is 2.25% of that 10km. The 46m wide is 0.46% of 10km. You will not spot that with naked human eye in space, it would be a speck. Plus you circled the mine, not the excavator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago That wiki link shows the measurement of the bagger 293. 225m length is 2.25% of that 10km. The 46m wide is 0.46% of 10km. You will not spot that with naked human eye in space, it would be a speck. Plus you circled the mine, not the excavator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago That wiki link shows the measurement of the bagger 293. 225m length is 2.25% of that 10km. The 46m wide is 0.46% of 10km. You will not spot that with naked human eye in space, it would be a speck. Plus you circled the mine, not the excavator. permalink fedilink source parent
