Just as a reminder since the conversation is going to the same tired tropes:

Even still, safer. That potential collision from ignoring proper right of way in the roundabout is still a safer angle of attack at lower speeds.

@Neato If people were going through the intersection at 30mph with the roundabout, how fast would they be traveling those streets without it? The >>30mph streets are likely the fundamental issue here since I doubt anyone is accelerating into or in the roundabouts. I bet these are huge, wide, roads with big clearings in the easements to promote that high DOT letter grade (which, outside of expressways, correlates with the most dangerous roads).

Fairly high-speed roundabouts are possible, but if the road really needs such high speeds odds are pretty good you'd be smarter to have a simple stop (for a country road) or a more thoughtful design (for an urban road) to eliminate the need for a huge roundabout structure. Usually the "we tried nothing and are all out of ideas" approach North American designers take is to just make a massive, signal-controlled intersection and change nothing else about the overall street pattern.

My apologies. I didn't explain correctly. In my case, the person exiting the circle from the inside lane is exiting into a single exit lane. The signage when entering the circle forbids this. You must change lanes to the right/outer lane before exiting certain exits.

So my situation, 2 cars are traveling in the circle, one in the inner lane, one outer. Both want to take the next exit, that's a single lane. Inner car veers across outer lane to the exit, nearly hitting the other car.