RaivoKulli comments on Should Climate Protesters Be Less Annoying?

Climate

9,002 readers

3,224 active

724 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

You won't get anyone not already convinced to listen to your message if the people are hung up on hating what you're doing and thinking you're a moron.

It just seems like a bad way to reach or convince anyone.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] raginghummus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Not really true, the evidence shows the popularity of the group may go down but concern over the issue goes up.

Tell us a better way that hasn't already been tried, one that's proportional to the urgency. Genuinely open to ideas.

The suffragettes were more than annoying, they blew stuff up and burnt down buildings and they were effective.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 years ago

I would be interested in this evidence. I don't think there's been a whole lot of time to study these more ideotic hand glue and ruining paintings stunts but at least short term effects should be something that can be studied.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent