26
Intentionally corrupting LLM training data? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago* by to c/programming@programming.dev
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Inspired by the comments on this Ars article, I've decided to program my website to "poison the well" when it gets a request from GPTBot.

The intuitive approach is just to generate some HTML like this:

<p>
// Twenty pages of random words
</p>

(I also considered just hardcoding twenty megabytes of "FUCK YOU," but that's a little juvenile for my taste.)

Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with ML beyond a few basic concepts, so I'm unsure if this would get me the most bang for my buck.

What do you smarter people on Lemmy think?

(I'm aware this won't do much, but I'm petty.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 3 years ago

I won't be using CSS or JS. I control the entire stack, so I can do a server-side check - GPTBot user agents get random garbage, everyone else gets the real deal.

Obviously this relies on OpenAI not masking their user agent, but I think webmasters would notice a conspicuous lack of hits if they did that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent