you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I think it’s running it at a loss too. But there’s no reason these platforms couldn’t be publicly owned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It was, but monetization has been so aggressively everywhere that I think they finally are in the black at least since 2018.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I had no idea. You’re right. It was a $15B business in 2019. https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/3/21121207/youtube-google-alphabet-earnings-revenue-first-time-reveal-q4-2019

    Makes the ads seem even more obscene now that I know that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Publicly owned by which government? Because I don't think YouTube's home of the US is really a good choice right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • I agree. I’m not thinking about USA at all.

    As for the EU, we should fund a federated or decentralised system. I think it works well on Lemmy. For example I know not to trust feddit.org for anything related to Palestine. Content on other servers shows their pro-Israel bias.

    I think a system like that could benefit the US to a point, at least until the government block all external news and commentary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    A centralized platform providing infrastructure could be financed using a tax on every internet subscription.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment