this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
585 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19685 readers
1415 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was looking through some old vacation pictures and came across this one. It sure gives a perspective on how big these trees are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is a single study, and it states that "that perhaps a fifth of the Amazon basin, in the south, may have been savannah until the shift, with forests covering the rest". So it's not that the forest was all farmland, there was farmland close to the forest and it grew to cover it. This is very different from what you're claiming.

And again, it's not possible for such biodiversity to develop in such a short amount of time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My claim is that humanity made the Amazon rainforest what it is today. I stand by that, and my claim grows stronger with each new ancient city discovered under the trees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yeah, I disagree. We didn't play an active part in doing this, we played a passive one by not fucking it up. I'm also not responsible for a mountain just because I don't dig it up.

Even if you were right, your own study says that we'd at most be responsible for 1/5th.