I’ve been noticing an unsettling trend in the 3D printing world: more and more printer manufacturers are locking down their devices with proprietary firmware, cloud-based software, and other anti-consumer restrictions. Despite this, they still receive glowing reviews, even from tech-savvy communities.

Back in the day, 3D printing was all about open-source hardware, modding, and user control. Now, it feels like we’re heading towards the same path as smartphones and other consumer tech—walled gardens, forced online accounts, and limited third-party compatibility. Some companies even prevent users from using alternative slicers or modifying firmware without jumping through hoops.

My question is: Has 3D printing gone too mainstream? Are newer users simply unaware (or uninterested) in the dangers of locked-down ecosystems? Have we lost the awareness of FOSS (Free and Open-Source Software) and user freedom that once defined this space?

I’d love to hear thoughts from the community. Do you think this is just a phase, or are we stuck on this trajectory? What can we do to push back against enshitification before it’s too late?

(Transparency Note: I wrote this text myself, but since English is not my first language, I used LLM to refine some formulations. The core content and ideas are entirely my own.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago (7 children)

It's giving me serious pause when looking at things like the new Bambu printer

I really like my x1c, but I haven't upgraded it's firmware yet, and probably never will, because the local features are just too good. I know I can replace a lot of the bambu cloud features with octoanywhere, but I shouldn't have to

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I installed the X-plus firmware, switched to LAN mode, blocked WAN acess at my router and use Orca slicer and honestly, I'm pretty happy with the result. That doesn't mean I'd give Bambu a second chance after their recent moves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Apparently the h2d is crippled if you use offline mode. No cutter or laser support

    This is what I was always afraid of. With the x1c they didn't really take away any hardware features if you put it offline and so the trade-off was acceptable. But locking you out of the physical hardware that you've purchased is a whole new story. Kind of like the dishwashers that require an app to do a rinse cycle.

    For what the h2d costs you can get an awful lot of printer from a different brand

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Honestly, if I were in the market for another machine right now I'd be taking a hard look at building a Voron. I don't WANT a project like that, but it seems like the best compromise in the quality and capability vs price compromise. I'm told they're working on a 600mm³ model that may really tempt me when they finish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah I'm keeping eyes on the voron.

    My next printer must have the following, else it's not much of an upgrade

    • Multiple extruders or changeable tool heads
    • 500mm^3 print volume
    • Actively heated enclosure
    • Lidar and auto tramming
    • Ams like thing
    • Full opensource
    • Core xy. Not interested in a bed slinger
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We're on very similar pages I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments