this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1062 points (97.3% liked)
People Twitter
6443 readers
1571 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's really not proving much of anything. These new "concepts" and "paradigms" are nothing more than buzzwords thrown onto old concepts. Every scam is a scam that's been done before even if there's a new layer of glittery wrapping paper over it. Who're you trying to convince more, the potential suckers or yourself?
The internet is a buzzword thrown onto old concepts? Instantaneous transfer of large amounts of data? Democratization and seamless diffusion of anything, from memes to "money"? "no but crypto is indeed a scam" is completely missing my point, and hitting the meme again
Your point is adding fancy words to make something sound smarter, likely screwing someone along the way, if the track record of the use of "paradigms" is any indication. It's okay to let at least some things stay simple. If someone broke into my home, I wouldn't call the cops and report a "spry possession-reappropriating malcontent", I'd report a thief. Same with crypto, I wouldn't report a "financial savant", I'd report a money launderer. You see, sometimes adding fancy, unneeded words to something does nothing but make you sound like a pretentious tool.
"Paradigm" is a word I chose to convey a specific meaning, which is "the way you approach/think about something". It might be more common in my language, I'm not trying to make either crypto or me sound smarter. I'm for precision of language, if you're more into newspeak you do you. You also seem to think I'm trying to convince you that "crypto is good", which is not the case. You have either misunderstood my comment, or are just trying to pick a bone. Either way, that's not very debatable for a racoon :)
My point is that people fall into fallacies by simplifying things too much, and only looking at the surface. See how your doubling down on "crypto actually bad" is beside it? Granted, I really should've picked a different case in point than cryptocurrencies ¯\_(ツ)_/¯