cross-posted from: https://feddit.it/post/15755274

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If they had control when the first 3, then 4 engines failed, why didn’t they shut off the remaining 2 engines that would go on to spin the rocket?

According to Manley, the remaining engines were non-vectoring, so there was never a way to keep flying straight with lopsided thrust. Shutting down would have kept it from spinning and allowed more data acquisition before aborting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You saying shut down the engines from the ground? The vehicle computer would have a much better understanding of the system than the people on the ground during those first minutes. I'm guessing they just needed to trust their programming at that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    If you’re talking milliseconds, yes, but it was many seconds between losing the engines and aborting. If they have the nasa level of engineers monitoring this, they sh out k f have noticed pretty fast. Either one should have shut them down faster.

    Even the camera director had noticed and cut away to the studio.

  • source
  • parent