2113
Fucking leeches (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
356 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Did those friends run the risk of having to pay for a new roof or anything else that can go wrong with a house? Tell me you've never owned a house without telling me you've never owned a house

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Don't try to talk sense into the senseless.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Did the landlord have to risk losing his own home when the person who owns it decides they are done being a decent human and kicks them out for a higher paying tenant, or sells the property to another landlord who will do the same? Do they have to beg someone to come fix their shit in a timely manner or do they just call a repair man who doesn't charge them $250/mo for the privilege of paying off someone else's mortgage so they can call the repair man for you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I rent two apartments in a state where all of that is not possible. Evictions take months and if repairs are not made quickly the tenant is legally entitled to withhold rent. But while on the topic I am most certainly on the hook for inflationary swings in:

    • any and all repairs
    • gas and electric
    • insurance
    • property taxes
    • landscaping and snow removal

    There is no free lunch, no one side is correct. Stop pretending this topic is black and white. There are some good landlords, many bad. Same goes for tenants.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    There is no free lunch, no one side is correct

    Except the only reason they do any of the shit you just mentioned is because of government regulation. And it varies wildly by state.

    There is a reason that those laws exist. Because they need to exist.

    So no, this is not a "both sides" thing.

    That's also completely ignoring the completely off-balanced power mechanic that exists between landlord and tenant, equating them as you did is super disingenuous.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    One reason it's obvious you don't have experience with home ownership is that you're acting like the repair man is free and not easily an aggregate of 250/month when expensive repairs are needed. That is $3000 my dude, which is easily a single plumbing problem that the landlord, not the tenant, has to pay for out of pocket.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's clear you've never had to rent a property from a shitty landlord before or you'd know they would just evict you, condemn the property and sell the land to recoup their "investment" rather than pay $3000 of their hard earned money fixing the damage some ungrateful shit did to THEIR property. You keep coming up with convoluted hypotheticals that assume the landlord will always act in the best faith to justify a practice that fundamentally should not exist. One or two "good" landlords don't redeem all of them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The people here arguing against this live in states that have literally legislated protections for tenants against predatory landlords. The only reason they even think they have an argument, is because people fought very hard in their state, for minimal tenant protections.

    Most of the same people would be doing every single one of those predatory things if they were legally allowed to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The funny thing is they’re arguing with someone who has been illegally evicted several times. What exactly do they expect poor people to do about it, hire a lawyer and sue? For the chance of what, getting back into a rental run by a now (more) hostile landlord? Get monetary damages? How much? Enough to buy a house? No? Then the problem just repeats.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    That is $3000 my dude, which is easily a single plumbing problem

    If you mean busted water and all the repairs, sure, but that's on the landlord for not ever checking on their property (unless the tenant did something very stupid, which is possible)

    I own my home and just had some plumbing work done in California (king of expensive) and 3k is about 10x what it cost me for a couple hours of plumber work

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent