1191
Brother accused of locking down third-party printer ink cartridges via forced firmware updates, removing older firmware versions from support portals [see comments] (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
247 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Brother deny the claims:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/

via https://startrek.website/comment/15279250

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Could this be anything related to government printer tracking requirements?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I believe that only applies to ink jet. You can hardly make secret dots in B&W.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There is something similar for B&W laser printing. Text is never 100% black, but rastered. You can digitally hide a whole lot of information in microraster on a page of printed text.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Text is never 100% black, but rastered.

    Does “rastered” mean the image is mapped onto a very fine grid and each square is given a 0-100 value for intensity of ink? I looked it up, and it seemed like the squares are given a binary value, but this is nowhere near my wheelhouse and I’m honestly not sure I understood the Wikipedia page, let alone the references

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    It is actually quite easy: "Black" print does not mean that 100% of all pixels are actually set. Print pixels are never perfect squares, so even if the printer only prints half of the dots, the print is still dark enough. If not, it could print 70% or 80%, but lets stick to 50% for ease of argument.

    So instead of

    XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX

    it would print

    X X X X
 X X X X
X X X X

    For you, it would still be a "roughly black" spot (keep in mind these 8x3 pixel are 0.032mm wide and 0.012mm high on good laser printer).

    Would you notice if the pattern was slightly different, like

    X X X X
 X XX  X
X X X X

    Make a bonanza of those small changes nobody can see, and you can hide thosands of bytes of data in those patterns on any printed page.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent