687
Alibaba Releases Advanced Open Video Model, Immediately Becomes AI Porn Machine (www.404media.co)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
250 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Mirror: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/rHqPf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Am I reading this right? You're for prosecuting people who have broken no laws?

I'll add this; I have sexual fantasies (not involving children) that would be repugnant to me IRL. Should I be in jail for having those fantasies, even though I would never act on them?

This sounds like some Minority Report hellscape society.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Correct. This quickly approaches thought crime.

    What about an AI gen of a violent rape and murder. Shouldn't that also be illegal.

    But we have movies that have protected that sort of thing for years; graphically. Do those the become illegal after the fact?

    And we also have movies of children being victimized so do these likewise become illegal?

    We already have studies that show watching violence does not make one violent and while some refuse to accept that, it is well established science.

    There is no reason to believe the same isn't true for watching sexual assault. There are been many many movies that contain such scenes.

    But ultimately the issue will become that there is no way to prevent it. The hardware to generate this stuff is already in our pockets. It may not be efficient but it's possible and efficiency will increase.

    The prompts to generate this stuff are easily shared and there is no way to stop that without monitoring all communication and even then I'm sure work around would occur.

    Prohibition requires society sacrifice freedoms and we have to decide what weee willing to sacrifice here because as we've seen with or prohibitions, once we unleash the law on one, it can be impossible to undo.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago

    Ok watch adult porn then watch a movie in which women or children are abused. Note how the abuse is in no way sexualized exactly opposite of porn. It often likely takes place off screen and when rape in general appears on screen between zero and no nudity co-occurs. For children it basically always happens off screen.

    Simulated child abuse has been federally illegal for ~20 years in the US and we appear to have very little trouble telling the difference between prosecuting pedos and cinema even whilst we have struggled enough with sexuality in general.

    But ultimately the issue will become that there is no way to prevent it.

    This argument works well enough for actual child porn. We certainly don't catch it all but every prosecution takes one more pedo off the streets. The net effect is positive. We don't catch most car thieves either and nobody suggests we legalize car theft.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Am I reading this right? You’re for prosecuting people who have broken no laws?

    No I'm for making it against the law to simulate pedophile shit as the net effect is fewer abused kids than if such images were to be legal. Notably you are free to fantasize about whatever you like its the actual creation and sharing of images that would be illegal. Far from being a minority report hellscape its literally the present way things already are many places.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lol, how can you say that do confidently? How would you know that with fewer AI CP you get less abused kids? And what is the logic behind it?

    Demand doesn’t really drop if something is illegal (same goes for drugs). The only thing you reduce is offering, which just resulting in making the thing that got illegal more valuable (this wakes attention of shady money grabbers that hate regulation / give a shit about law enforcement and therefore do illegal stuff to get money) and that you have to pay a shitton of government money maintaining all the prisons.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Basically every pedo in prison is one who isn't abusing kids. Every pedo on a list is one who won't be left alone with a young family member. Actually reducing AI CP doesn't actually by itself do anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wrong. Every pedo in prison is one WHO HAS ALREADY ABUSED A CHILD, whether directly or indirectly. There is an argument to be made, and some studies that show, that dealing with Minor Attracted People before they cross the line can be effective. Unfortunately, to do this we need to be able to have a logical and civil conversation about the topic, and the current political climate does not allow for that conversation to be had. The consequence is that preventable crimes are not being prevented, and more children are suffering for it in the long run.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    People are locked up all the time for just possessing child porn without having abused anyone. This isn't a bad thing because they are a danger to society.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •