this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025

639 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

technology@lemmy.world

88,803 readers

14,593 active

3,519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Framework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PC (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 years ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

282 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn't get it to work because of signal integrity issues.

parent

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago

I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?

parent