▲ 99 ▼ Red states create their own DOGE efforts to cut state government. (stateline.org) submitted 2 years ago by Cat@ponder.cat to c/politics@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) Then what’s the point? It doesn’t stop scrapers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] HorreC@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) it would if proven give them rights to seek damages. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago No it wouldn’t have. Licensing isn’t 1 sided. You have to have both parties AGREE to the license. In this case it’s just text on each message. The reason OpenAI was able to scrape the internet largely consequence free is because they never agreed to the ToS of the websites, thus they are not bound by those terms. I agree that it isn’t right or morally correct, but legally it’s okay. Additionally, by signing up to Lemmy, they grant certain rights and privileges to their instance and others due to agreeing to the license. In fact, lemmy could make it easier for scrapers, as lemmy will happily deliver content to your instance, simplifying scraping. permalink fedilink source parent [–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are you adding it manually or is your client adding it automatically? If the latter, what client are you using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) Then what’s the point? It doesn’t stop scrapers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] HorreC@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) it would if proven give them rights to seek damages. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago No it wouldn’t have. Licensing isn’t 1 sided. You have to have both parties AGREE to the license. In this case it’s just text on each message. The reason OpenAI was able to scrape the internet largely consequence free is because they never agreed to the ToS of the websites, thus they are not bound by those terms. I agree that it isn’t right or morally correct, but legally it’s okay. Additionally, by signing up to Lemmy, they grant certain rights and privileges to their instance and others due to agreeing to the license. In fact, lemmy could make it easier for scrapers, as lemmy will happily deliver content to your instance, simplifying scraping. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HorreC@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) it would if proven give them rights to seek damages. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago No it wouldn’t have. Licensing isn’t 1 sided. You have to have both parties AGREE to the license. In this case it’s just text on each message. The reason OpenAI was able to scrape the internet largely consequence free is because they never agreed to the ToS of the websites, thus they are not bound by those terms. I agree that it isn’t right or morally correct, but legally it’s okay. Additionally, by signing up to Lemmy, they grant certain rights and privileges to their instance and others due to agreeing to the license. In fact, lemmy could make it easier for scrapers, as lemmy will happily deliver content to your instance, simplifying scraping. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago No it wouldn’t have. Licensing isn’t 1 sided. You have to have both parties AGREE to the license. In this case it’s just text on each message. The reason OpenAI was able to scrape the internet largely consequence free is because they never agreed to the ToS of the websites, thus they are not bound by those terms. I agree that it isn’t right or morally correct, but legally it’s okay. Additionally, by signing up to Lemmy, they grant certain rights and privileges to their instance and others due to agreeing to the license. In fact, lemmy could make it easier for scrapers, as lemmy will happily deliver content to your instance, simplifying scraping. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are you adding it manually or is your client adding it automatically? If the latter, what client are you using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent