you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It makes sense as a protectionist measure. They don't care about regular people running it locally. They want to protect their OpenAI cash cow from competition. This law would allow them to go after companies using cheaper models from China forcing them to pay for the expensive models from OpenAI. And it looks like this would apply to anything derived from Chinese models, so they could even sue people running stuff like DeepSeek as a service based in US. It's a price fixing mechanism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    This raises another question, LLM of Theseus

    If I take Deepseek and alter it's source code, will it still be considered "Deepseek", at what point will it stop being Deepseek? If it's not considered Deepseek, will I be able to run a service with it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Boy, I can't wait for "Depthfind" 🥸 🐬

    I also wonder what this would mean for LLMs that use Deepseek's techniques...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments