technology

23495 readers

287 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

216

For people who actually use them, are current open alternatives that bad in comparison? (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If you use GIMP and Krita together, you can get like 80-90% of the features photoshop had

The main problem for me is that GIMP has no equivalent to content-aware fill, so the closest open source equivalent to that afaik is using krita's AI slop stable diffusion plugin to generate fill ins, which takes much longer to generate and comes with its own foibles

this is coming from someone that uses graphic design software primarily to make memes though so shrug-outta-hecks

while making this comment i searched online and apparently GIMP has a content-aware fill esque plugin called resynthesizer, idk if its any good but if it is that is huge

https://github.com/bootchk/resynthesizer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

resynthesizer is like leagues ahead of content-aware, i've been using it for ages

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was about to say, not only does GIMP have content aware fill, it has had it for longer than Photoshop.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

i wish i had known about it a decade ago lenin-pensive

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

I remember trying resynthesizer back in the day and it was pretty bad back then. The photoshop algorithm was pretty clearly superior