▲ 513 ▼ The U.S. just pledged hundreds of billions to protect its AI leadership. A Chinese startup with a ‘joke of a budget‘ may have already undercut those hopes (fortune.com) submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 98 comments fedilink hide all child comments Paywall removed: https://archive.is/MqHc4
[+] Breve@pawb.social 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 years ago (4 children) Capitalism has never been healthier. This IS Capitalism, not an anomaly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Breve@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] underisk@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago Can’t have a corporate oligarchy without capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have read the wealth of nations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Capitalism, instead of Adam Smith definition, becomes supremacy of capital. Corporatism is actually more prominent than "shareholder rights/supremacy". At any rate, Adam Smith said free markets where fair markets that resulted in perfect competition. Free competition sucks for oligarchs, because corrupt markets are more profitable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 years ago (4 children) Capitalism has never been healthier. This IS Capitalism, not an anomaly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Breve@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] underisk@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago Can’t have a corporate oligarchy without capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have read the wealth of nations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Capitalism, instead of Adam Smith definition, becomes supremacy of capital. Corporatism is actually more prominent than "shareholder rights/supremacy". At any rate, Adam Smith said free markets where fair markets that resulted in perfect competition. Free competition sucks for oligarchs, because corrupt markets are more profitable. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Breve@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago Can’t have a corporate oligarchy without capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have read the wealth of nations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Capitalism, instead of Adam Smith definition, becomes supremacy of capital. Corporatism is actually more prominent than "shareholder rights/supremacy". At any rate, Adam Smith said free markets where fair markets that resulted in perfect competition. Free competition sucks for oligarchs, because corrupt markets are more profitable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago Capitalism, instead of Adam Smith definition, becomes supremacy of capital. Corporatism is actually more prominent than "shareholder rights/supremacy". At any rate, Adam Smith said free markets where fair markets that resulted in perfect competition. Free competition sucks for oligarchs, because corrupt markets are more profitable. permalink fedilink source parent