you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 125 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The funny thing is using a good adblocker and I haven't noticed a single youtube ad, so if they're to blame, they're also the solution. I don't see how this move functionally does anything other than punish those who can't block ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    People that know what ad blockers are frequently use them. The act of punishing the group that isn't aware of adblockers simply will drive more users to discover/make use of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “We have to punish you because of what those other people are doing to legitimately evade punishment” is only a useful argument if the punished group can somehow cover for those not affected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    No no no.....don't hit them. That leaves a mark. Instead, hold them down, and tickle them for an hour.

    Then if they try to go to the police, and say "they tickled me!" the cops will just laugh. And, no marks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    The only reason adblockers would be to blame would be because Google wanted to make up for lost revenue, similar to the myth of high end department stores having high prices because they expect their customers to shoplift.

  • source
  • parent