▲ 2358 ▼ Fuck SUVs in particular. (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 193 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] scytale@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] clgoh@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What about the Ranger? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Despite being a "smaller" truck, that's still bigger than many 2010 Tacomas. In Ford's lineup, only the Maverick is under 200" long, less than 70" tall. Despite being a "teeny tiny truck", it's still bigger than a 1995 Ranger by a fair margin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clgoh@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) What about the Ranger? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Despite being a "smaller" truck, that's still bigger than many 2010 Tacomas. In Ford's lineup, only the Maverick is under 200" long, less than 70" tall. Despite being a "teeny tiny truck", it's still bigger than a 1995 Ranger by a fair margin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Despite being a "smaller" truck, that's still bigger than many 2010 Tacomas. In Ford's lineup, only the Maverick is under 200" long, less than 70" tall. Despite being a "teeny tiny truck", it's still bigger than a 1995 Ranger by a fair margin. permalink fedilink source parent
