this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
494 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

60725 readers
4212 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 250 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I feel like this is an incredibly obvious yes. They were down for 12 hours. They put Trump's name as their savior in the error message... Then the CEO shows up to his inauguration. Trump freely admits that it is because he believes TikTok helped him win the election:

“I have a warm spot in my heart for TikTok because I won youth by 34 points,” Trump said in December. “And there are those that say TikTok had something to do with that.”

So. Yeah. Of fucking course it was. Fuck national security and all that nonsense, ME ME ME!

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was thinking the same, I'm 99% certain Trump required his name to be included in the welcome back message as a condition for not implementing the ban.

It's very poorly written theatre

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

The audience who enjoys this theater isn’t exactly sophisticated. Pro wrestling has more complex plot and believable characters.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also they’re now censoring anything anti Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that? I’ve heard about this, too, but the evidence was dubious at best

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"These reports have not been confirmed at this time," the article notes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't see this. Would you care to explain?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some Tik Tok creators are complaining on the platform that they are being censored, specifically in regards to talking poorly about the Trump administration.

As much as some people harp on Tik Tok being a bastion of non-censorship, it has been proven repeatedly that this is not actually true. They just pick and choose carefully what to censor and when. Most platforms do that. It's not surprising. It also wouldn't be surprising for them to not promote or prioritize content with their algorithm that could be seen by the current POTUS as inflammatory because they are attempting to gain favor with him at the moment in exchange for potential political favors in regards to the platform in the future.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/25/revealed-how-tiktok-censors-videos-that-do-not-please-beijing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you. I understand the situation, I was asking specifically about what "inside the house means" and what's coming out of it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Oh. I see. Sorry. I didn't understand. Inside the house means the claims are originating directly from users of Tik Tok on the Tik Tok platform. There was an old horror movie about a babysitter getting prank calls about the children in the house being in danger. It turned out the calls were coming from inside the house.

https://thoughtcatalog.com/christine-stockton/2021/07/the-call-is-coming-from-inside-the-house-horror-trope-is-based-on-a-sady-true-story/

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And didn't they explicitly state that they went down because "the US government is not working on a solution", 12h before this government changed?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyeer3qp12o

It said that unless the government immediately stepped in to assure the video app it would not be punished for violating the looming ban, it would be "forced to go dark on January 19".<<

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It did not make him look good to anyone with more than half of a brain.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fortunately no one with half a brain voted for him anyway

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Truly all the more scary