References

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think the discussion there is quite reasonable given the circumstances, and official_name:en-US once the GNIS updates is the correct way to go until people actually start calling it the new name.

what a stupid timeline this is

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The problem they are addressing right now is that "Gulf of America" is not an equivalent name, as "Gulf of America" can and will only apply to the waters next to USA states, so it is a regional name, official or regular.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Hmm, right. This makes it somewhat more complicated. If this new name starts being used by many people and organizations, I suppose it would make sense to create a new place=sea boundary=maritime, but until then it'd be kind of stupid to pollute the map with a new entity just because it's in the official records.

  • source
  • parent