Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I see a lot of good discussion here. I've been on proton for years now, using my own domain. While true that Andy is one of 5 board members, and it's a nonprofit etc, these statements are raising hairs on my neck, personally.

Does anyone have a good guide on problems associated with self-hosting email?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I don't know any guide, but deliverability is the biggest concern and it may also not be fully under control. Sometimes IP blocks get blacklisted or deranked and your emails end in spam, and you might not even know that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think the main difficulty is getting companies like Gmail to recognize your domain as legitimate, as they don't by default

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    By default it should be OK. The problem is if your IP was previously used by someone bad before it recycled to you.

    But it you have a server for a decade and have held the IP the whole time, you should be OK if you setup your email server correctly (which you probably won't)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I don't think I do this like you're suggesting, but I have my email hosted at opalstack. I've been really happy with them. I don't have a server-side spam solution yet, though. I just set up spam rules on Thunderbird on my local machine.

  • source
  • parent