▲ 180 ▼ Linux Foundation bands together Chromium browser makers in a “neutral space” (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by tkw8@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 years ago (25 children) donate to mozilla people permalink fedilink source hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Umm... no. If Mozilla needs more resources for their browser, they can stop paying their CEOs so much and replace analysts with engineers. They can also stop wasting their resources on projects nobody cares about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) i didn't think you understand how funding works permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago They said they’re not going to provide the foundation with additional funding while the foundation is spending their money in ways they disagree with. What is the specific misunderstanding? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (17 children) Yeah, because 500 M/year from Google are not enough. Gotta increase the CEO paycheck. Moreover, donations don't even fund FF development. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (16 children) and if more people donated they wouldn't need alternative sources of funding...... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago You have to be born yesterday to believe this. The business will do whatever they believe will make them the most amount of money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -16 points 2 years ago (14 children) Again, what you donate don't fund FF development but goes toward Mozilla's bullshit/activism/whatever/huge CEO paychecks. Who cares about that? I for sure don't. I will celebrate the day Mozilla disappears for good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (8 children) It's weird to call for the disbandment of a relatively small company producing one of the major alternative browsers for what would otherwise be a monopoly. What is Mozilla doing that Google and Apple aren't doing but worse? Why direct all this negative energy at the small one keeping things tolerable? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) for what would otherwise be a monopoly. Firefox only gets funding from Google to prevent the US government from stepping in to break up a monopoly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) Major alternative? At 2.x% market share? You people are very delusional. By the way, the shitty market share is exclusively Mozilla's fault, even if they're always complaining about evil Google (while they take that sweet 500 M/years from that evil company and waste them on anything but fixing their shitty browser). Mozilla is ascummy/scammy company that should have died years ago. I'll celebrate their fall. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/b200-mozilla-foundation-form-990-public-disclosure-ty23.pdf Mozilla CEO pay is $6M, and the rest of the board members are about $0.7M or less. Total executive compensation is a little under $10M. Their total revenue is $64M. By and large, the money is going toward developers and activism, which is where it should go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago Feel free to donate, then. For all I care... permalink fedilink source parent [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) mozilla's activism is part of the reason why i donate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, gotta love how their CEO donates to anti-gay causes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent [–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today -3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I use Firefox (and forks) myself but wouldn't donate to it. It's like Wikipedia - a great project with a shitty parent company which'll spend all of your donations on shit projects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) It saddens me to see musk propaganda at work :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) How's musk related to this one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Simple, he wants the wikipedia and since he cant have it he decided to trash it publicly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Umm... no. If Mozilla needs more resources for their browser, they can stop paying their CEOs so much and replace analysts with engineers. They can also stop wasting their resources on projects nobody cares about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) i didn't think you understand how funding works permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago They said they’re not going to provide the foundation with additional funding while the foundation is spending their money in ways they disagree with. What is the specific misunderstanding? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) i didn't think you understand how funding works permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago They said they’re not going to provide the foundation with additional funding while the foundation is spending their money in ways they disagree with. What is the specific misunderstanding? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago They said they’re not going to provide the foundation with additional funding while the foundation is spending their money in ways they disagree with. What is the specific misunderstanding? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (17 children) Yeah, because 500 M/year from Google are not enough. Gotta increase the CEO paycheck. Moreover, donations don't even fund FF development. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (16 children) and if more people donated they wouldn't need alternative sources of funding...... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago You have to be born yesterday to believe this. The business will do whatever they believe will make them the most amount of money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -16 points 2 years ago (14 children) Again, what you donate don't fund FF development but goes toward Mozilla's bullshit/activism/whatever/huge CEO paychecks. Who cares about that? I for sure don't. I will celebrate the day Mozilla disappears for good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (8 children) It's weird to call for the disbandment of a relatively small company producing one of the major alternative browsers for what would otherwise be a monopoly. What is Mozilla doing that Google and Apple aren't doing but worse? Why direct all this negative energy at the small one keeping things tolerable? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) for what would otherwise be a monopoly. Firefox only gets funding from Google to prevent the US government from stepping in to break up a monopoly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) Major alternative? At 2.x% market share? You people are very delusional. By the way, the shitty market share is exclusively Mozilla's fault, even if they're always complaining about evil Google (while they take that sweet 500 M/years from that evil company and waste them on anything but fixing their shitty browser). Mozilla is ascummy/scammy company that should have died years ago. I'll celebrate their fall. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/b200-mozilla-foundation-form-990-public-disclosure-ty23.pdf Mozilla CEO pay is $6M, and the rest of the board members are about $0.7M or less. Total executive compensation is a little under $10M. Their total revenue is $64M. By and large, the money is going toward developers and activism, which is where it should go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago Feel free to donate, then. For all I care... permalink fedilink source parent [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) mozilla's activism is part of the reason why i donate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, gotta love how their CEO donates to anti-gay causes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (16 children) and if more people donated they wouldn't need alternative sources of funding...... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago You have to be born yesterday to believe this. The business will do whatever they believe will make them the most amount of money. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -16 points 2 years ago (14 children) Again, what you donate don't fund FF development but goes toward Mozilla's bullshit/activism/whatever/huge CEO paychecks. Who cares about that? I for sure don't. I will celebrate the day Mozilla disappears for good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (8 children) It's weird to call for the disbandment of a relatively small company producing one of the major alternative browsers for what would otherwise be a monopoly. What is Mozilla doing that Google and Apple aren't doing but worse? Why direct all this negative energy at the small one keeping things tolerable? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) for what would otherwise be a monopoly. Firefox only gets funding from Google to prevent the US government from stepping in to break up a monopoly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) Major alternative? At 2.x% market share? You people are very delusional. By the way, the shitty market share is exclusively Mozilla's fault, even if they're always complaining about evil Google (while they take that sweet 500 M/years from that evil company and waste them on anything but fixing their shitty browser). Mozilla is ascummy/scammy company that should have died years ago. I'll celebrate their fall. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/b200-mozilla-foundation-form-990-public-disclosure-ty23.pdf Mozilla CEO pay is $6M, and the rest of the board members are about $0.7M or less. Total executive compensation is a little under $10M. Their total revenue is $64M. By and large, the money is going toward developers and activism, which is where it should go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago Feel free to donate, then. For all I care... permalink fedilink source parent [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) mozilla's activism is part of the reason why i donate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, gotta love how their CEO donates to anti-gay causes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago You have to be born yesterday to believe this. The business will do whatever they believe will make them the most amount of money. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -16 points 2 years ago (14 children) Again, what you donate don't fund FF development but goes toward Mozilla's bullshit/activism/whatever/huge CEO paychecks. Who cares about that? I for sure don't. I will celebrate the day Mozilla disappears for good. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (8 children) It's weird to call for the disbandment of a relatively small company producing one of the major alternative browsers for what would otherwise be a monopoly. What is Mozilla doing that Google and Apple aren't doing but worse? Why direct all this negative energy at the small one keeping things tolerable? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) for what would otherwise be a monopoly. Firefox only gets funding from Google to prevent the US government from stepping in to break up a monopoly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) Major alternative? At 2.x% market share? You people are very delusional. By the way, the shitty market share is exclusively Mozilla's fault, even if they're always complaining about evil Google (while they take that sweet 500 M/years from that evil company and waste them on anything but fixing their shitty browser). Mozilla is ascummy/scammy company that should have died years ago. I'll celebrate their fall. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/b200-mozilla-foundation-form-990-public-disclosure-ty23.pdf Mozilla CEO pay is $6M, and the rest of the board members are about $0.7M or less. Total executive compensation is a little under $10M. Their total revenue is $64M. By and large, the money is going toward developers and activism, which is where it should go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago Feel free to donate, then. For all I care... permalink fedilink source parent [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) mozilla's activism is part of the reason why i donate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, gotta love how their CEO donates to anti-gay causes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (8 children) It's weird to call for the disbandment of a relatively small company producing one of the major alternative browsers for what would otherwise be a monopoly. What is Mozilla doing that Google and Apple aren't doing but worse? Why direct all this negative energy at the small one keeping things tolerable? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) for what would otherwise be a monopoly. Firefox only gets funding from Google to prevent the US government from stepping in to break up a monopoly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) Major alternative? At 2.x% market share? You people are very delusional. By the way, the shitty market share is exclusively Mozilla's fault, even if they're always complaining about evil Google (while they take that sweet 500 M/years from that evil company and waste them on anything but fixing their shitty browser). Mozilla is ascummy/scammy company that should have died years ago. I'll celebrate their fall. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) for what would otherwise be a monopoly. Firefox only gets funding from Google to prevent the US government from stepping in to break up a monopoly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [+] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah that's common knowledge, but that's also the problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) Major alternative? At 2.x% market share? You people are very delusional. By the way, the shitty market share is exclusively Mozilla's fault, even if they're always complaining about evil Google (while they take that sweet 500 M/years from that evil company and waste them on anything but fixing their shitty browser). Mozilla is ascummy/scammy company that should have died years ago. I'll celebrate their fall. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Of all the alternatives, it is the most major one. (Except for Apple devices where Safari is an option). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) So because they take money from Google but don't effectively challenge the monopoly, they ought to be done away with? All Hail our Chromium overlords! I agree that the exec salaries could use a heavy trimming to the benefit of their actual R&D, but right now, they're the biggest challenger to the dominance of Chromium. They could be better, sure, but I'd rather have mediocrity than no choice at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) They aren't challenging anything, don't be delusional. But, hey, I can't stop you from believing their narrative, (and in fairy tales) if that can make you happy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago What would you prefer then? For Firefox to stop existing, so that we all finally have to use Chromium? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/b200-mozilla-foundation-form-990-public-disclosure-ty23.pdf Mozilla CEO pay is $6M, and the rest of the board members are about $0.7M or less. Total executive compensation is a little under $10M. Their total revenue is $64M. By and large, the money is going toward developers and activism, which is where it should go. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago Feel free to donate, then. For all I care... permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Engywuck@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago Feel free to donate, then. For all I care... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) mozilla's activism is part of the reason why i donate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, gotta love how their CEO donates to anti-gay causes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, gotta love how their CEO donates to anti-gay causes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago you're thinking of braves ceo, brendan eich permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today -3 points 2 years ago (3 children) I use Firefox (and forks) myself but wouldn't donate to it. It's like Wikipedia - a great project with a shitty parent company which'll spend all of your donations on shit projects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) It saddens me to see musk propaganda at work :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) How's musk related to this one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Simple, he wants the wikipedia and since he cant have it he decided to trash it publicly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) It saddens me to see musk propaganda at work :( permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) How's musk related to this one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Simple, he wants the wikipedia and since he cant have it he decided to trash it publicly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) How's musk related to this one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Simple, he wants the wikipedia and since he cant have it he decided to trash it publicly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Loce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago Simple, he wants the wikipedia and since he cant have it he decided to trash it publicly. permalink fedilink source parent