you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 years ago (13 children)

How is KDE less keyboard-focused? I spent like ten minutes setting up kwin shortcuts and now have the same level of keyboard-only interaction as with any WM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Well, I guess because you don't need to do the ten minutes of setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Both KDE and Gnome have a comparable set of default keyboard shortcuts.

    The difference is if you are in KDE, you have easier ability to adjust to what you want with a lot more available shortcut actions, while in Gnome you generally are expected to live with the choices of the devs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (10 children)

    Oh, I get it! I just have to reprogram my brain to the GNOME way instead of the much more efficient way that I actually want!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

    Use a tiling wm. GNOME is for people who want a sane, human-friendly default.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (8 children)

    iOS users think the same way born from ignorance. But hey, if you don't mind inefficient workflows and an extreme lack of customization to fix that, then GNOME works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (7 children)

    I don't find it very inefficient. There's also plenty of customization. This is a pretty specious comparison; on iOS you literally pay money a la carte for minor customization options. On GNOME, you might have to turn to less-supported third party extensions, or God forbid do some very minor config file or command line work. Far less than you'd need to do to do something similar in a tiling wm, of course... And most things that end users who just want to actually use their computer might care about are supported already. The system tray is the single feature I think is glaringly missing from GNOME currently, hopefully they'll get that officially supported soon.

    Kind of weird to get so bent out of shape about some people choosing to use a certain interface.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Lmao, you even admit hoe dumb it is with the system tray. And you're wrong, I can have XFCE exactly hoe I want it in a matter of 15 minutes, using only the settings apps, and it will absolutely dog walk the workflows of GNOME.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    Lmao I was not expecting XFCE. You're funny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    It has the most sane defaults out of the box, and can literally run ciricles around GNOME as far as setting keyboard shortcuts. It's crazy you're so in love with the most neutered, asinine, uncustomizable DE in Linux and even admit how dogshit it is so why are we still discussing. You literally admitted it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Hahahahahaha you are so insanely triggered over nothing this is great

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments