Suck it micro USB, mini USB, and lightning! ๐Ÿชซ๐Ÿ”‹

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Sued for following the law and making sure the required connector is present and functional? Unless I'm missing something, the law doesn't require the port be exclusive. I mean, if it did, they'd have to stop including wireless charging, and I don't see that happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, its additional cost which acts as a moat by increasing development costs. now you need to design your new connector and make sure its compatible with the existing standard.

    If I'm a company who builds widgets and this new startup will have a better design you damn well bet i'm going to sue them to increase costs and decrease the likely hood they'll succeed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    And it would be tossed out for lack of standing before any arguments are heard or considered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] -1 points 2 years ago

    standing isnt some mythical unambiguous concept. in fact its almost entirely a legal fiction. times when standing should be granted its not and times when it shouldnt be it is. trying to make an argument that standing invalidates my point is fairly silly, since the very existence of this law has a chilling effect. denying that is foolish.

  • source
  • parent