1974
See?? I'm supporting togetherness (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 3 years ago* (9 children)

fossil fuels need to be phased out completely.

meat eating doesn't, it can be part of sustainable gardening.

but yeah the anti-vegan circlejerk is stupid, who gives a shit what you eat

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    The world is burning. Meat has got to go, just like short holidays by plane. And of course a whole bunch of other things. There is very little room to bargain here as we're way behind on our targets.

    who gives a shit what you eat

    We all should because we share this planet. You should judge a friend who eats steak frequently the same as someone who once in a while chops down a bit of rainforest. The consequences are the same.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -48 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    The animals that are being eaten, presumably

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Would chickens really know tho?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Is that the metric then? If you don't know you're going to be killed, it's ok to kill you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    If a life form alien to me was going to suddenly, randomly (from my perspective) kill me to use me as food, I don't think I would necessarily mind because I had no idea it was going to happen. If I lived my entire life in fear that I could be killed at any moment, I'd be less ok with it.

    I guess what I was going for was that trying to compare a chicken's understanding of mortality to our own isn't a compelling argument to me. I think the simple fact that they're alive and deserve to be treated with dignity is a better argument.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I don't know what the metric is, but chickens wouldn't exist without us eating them. So from a species standpoint they need us to keep eating them. From a humane standpoint it's probably cruel to keep the species alive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Agreed. The chicken's closest natural ancestor, the red jungle fowl, would continue to live in the wild. Unlike modern chickens, they only lay around once a month (as opposed to upwards of once a day), and they aren't bred to be excessively large to the point that many can't even walk properly. It would definitely be more humane to let these human made species go extinct.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent