334
Lake depths and heights (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Then go yell at OP about posting a non-map.

There's no lie here, nobody thought lakes are actually finger-shaped in cross-section.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Strawman arguments aside, it seems you've already forgotten how this comment chain started. Just let it go.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    You're the one being randomly aggressive in an otherwise-friendly conversation.

    I had forgotten the cross-sections were already mentioned, that's true. I mentally boiled down what you wrote to "not to scale means inconsistent scale". My point was that if there isn't any inconsistency in vertical scale - which is what I suspect - there's no "lie".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent