▲ 614 ▼ Solar modules now selling for less than €0.06/W in Europe (www.pv-magazine.com) submitted 2 years ago by ArtikBanana@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 163 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) If France can find space, surely Germany can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) If Finland could find space, Germany definitely can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Idk, Finland has a much lower population density vs Germany. France is something like 1/2 the population density, but they also have >50 reactors, so surely Germany can find room for a few... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Finland smaller tho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago Finland: 338,145 km² and 5.6 million people Germany: 357,596 km² and 82 million people Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago Yup, but population density should be what matters, because that implies how much usable space there is for waste disposal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Finland with it's vast swathes of frozen tundra. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* We don't have vast swaths of Frozen Tundras. This isn't Alaska. And it's actually stored south not north. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago And Sweden. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) If Finland could find space, Germany definitely can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Idk, Finland has a much lower population density vs Germany. France is something like 1/2 the population density, but they also have >50 reactors, so surely Germany can find room for a few... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Finland smaller tho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago Finland: 338,145 km² and 5.6 million people Germany: 357,596 km² and 82 million people Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago Yup, but population density should be what matters, because that implies how much usable space there is for waste disposal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Finland with it's vast swathes of frozen tundra. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* We don't have vast swaths of Frozen Tundras. This isn't Alaska. And it's actually stored south not north. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago And Sweden. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Idk, Finland has a much lower population density vs Germany. France is something like 1/2 the population density, but they also have >50 reactors, so surely Germany can find room for a few... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Finland smaller tho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago Finland: 338,145 km² and 5.6 million people Germany: 357,596 km² and 82 million people Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago Yup, but population density should be what matters, because that implies how much usable space there is for waste disposal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Finland smaller tho. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago Finland: 338,145 km² and 5.6 million people Germany: 357,596 km² and 82 million people Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago Yup, but population density should be what matters, because that implies how much usable space there is for waste disposal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago Finland: 338,145 km² and 5.6 million people Germany: 357,596 km² and 82 million people Where do you want to put your hazardous waste again? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago Yup, but population density should be what matters, because that implies how much usable space there is for waste disposal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Finland with it's vast swathes of frozen tundra. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* We don't have vast swaths of Frozen Tundras. This isn't Alaska. And it's actually stored south not north. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* We don't have vast swaths of Frozen Tundras. This isn't Alaska. And it's actually stored south not north. permalink fedilink source parent