▲ 571 ▼ Sysadmin shock as Windows Server 2025 installs itself (www.theregister.com) submitted 2 years ago by superkret@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (5 children) When the OS becomes the virus permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (4 children) When reading comprehension is limited to the title. MS mislabeled the update Heimdal (apparently a patchmanagement) auto-installed the falsely labeled update. If OP (this was reported by a Redditor on r/sysadmin) and their company is unable to properly set grace periods for windows updates I can't help them either. IMHO you are supposed to manually review and release updates either on a WSUS or the management interface of your patching solution. Not just "Hehe, auto install and see what happens". And if you do that shit, set a timeout for 14 days at least for uncritical rated updates. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They said they believe it was a mislabeled update. MS didn't respond. Before criticizing others for their reading comprehension, I think you could work on yourself too. There is a world, and it may be ours, where MS purposefully pushes this out. As the end of the article makes clear, this will be only a minor issue for those with good backup (which they probably all should but they don't), but for those who don't they'll be stuck with the new version and have to pay for the license of it. This is a large benefit to MS while they also get to pretend like it's just a mistake and not having backups makes it your issue, not theirs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Shouldnt you be able to just downgrade? Dunno if that works on the server version. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I come to the comments for someone to summarise the article for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reading (the TLDR) without complaining: Fine Complaining while only reading the comments: Not fine permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (4 children) When reading comprehension is limited to the title. MS mislabeled the update Heimdal (apparently a patchmanagement) auto-installed the falsely labeled update. If OP (this was reported by a Redditor on r/sysadmin) and their company is unable to properly set grace periods for windows updates I can't help them either. IMHO you are supposed to manually review and release updates either on a WSUS or the management interface of your patching solution. Not just "Hehe, auto install and see what happens". And if you do that shit, set a timeout for 14 days at least for uncritical rated updates. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They said they believe it was a mislabeled update. MS didn't respond. Before criticizing others for their reading comprehension, I think you could work on yourself too. There is a world, and it may be ours, where MS purposefully pushes this out. As the end of the article makes clear, this will be only a minor issue for those with good backup (which they probably all should but they don't), but for those who don't they'll be stuck with the new version and have to pay for the license of it. This is a large benefit to MS while they also get to pretend like it's just a mistake and not having backups makes it your issue, not theirs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Shouldnt you be able to just downgrade? Dunno if that works on the server version. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I come to the comments for someone to summarise the article for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reading (the TLDR) without complaining: Fine Complaining while only reading the comments: Not fine permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They said they believe it was a mislabeled update. MS didn't respond. Before criticizing others for their reading comprehension, I think you could work on yourself too. There is a world, and it may be ours, where MS purposefully pushes this out. As the end of the article makes clear, this will be only a minor issue for those with good backup (which they probably all should but they don't), but for those who don't they'll be stuck with the new version and have to pay for the license of it. This is a large benefit to MS while they also get to pretend like it's just a mistake and not having backups makes it your issue, not theirs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Shouldnt you be able to just downgrade? Dunno if that works on the server version. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Shouldnt you be able to just downgrade? Dunno if that works on the server version. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) I come to the comments for someone to summarise the article for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reading (the TLDR) without complaining: Fine Complaining while only reading the comments: Not fine permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reading (the TLDR) without complaining: Fine Complaining while only reading the comments: Not fine permalink fedilink source parent