▲ 307 ▼ Even Microsoft Notepad is getting AI text editing now (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by trespasser69@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] dukatos@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (6 children) They own Linux, too. Just wait for systemd-copilot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) They dont own it, they just own seats at the foundation table and thats not even 50% of the seats :p permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communism@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even if they owned the whole LF, the Linux Foundation does not develop systemd lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That too permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Microsoft does not own systemd And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dukatos@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nothing you wrote is true. Google Lennart Poettering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Actually, 100% of what I said is true. Let's go through it together Microsoft does not own systemd True. The closest thing to an "owner" the project has would be Red Hat (not owned by MS), but it's had over 2000 authors in its time. And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it True. This in fact happens already. Lots of distros that use systemd only use some components of it. It's GPL code, you can do that... Now let's move on to Lennart Poettering. Yeah, he was one of the top people behind systemd, and he has now moved to a job within Microsoft. What's your point? That doesn't mean systemd is Microsoft property now. That's not how it works lol. PulseAudio isn't either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) They dont own it, they just own seats at the foundation table and thats not even 50% of the seats :p permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] communism@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even if they owned the whole LF, the Linux Foundation does not develop systemd lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] communism@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even if they owned the whole LF, the Linux Foundation does not develop systemd lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Microsoft does not own systemd And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dukatos@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nothing you wrote is true. Google Lennart Poettering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Actually, 100% of what I said is true. Let's go through it together Microsoft does not own systemd True. The closest thing to an "owner" the project has would be Red Hat (not owned by MS), but it's had over 2000 authors in its time. And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it True. This in fact happens already. Lots of distros that use systemd only use some components of it. It's GPL code, you can do that... Now let's move on to Lennart Poettering. Yeah, he was one of the top people behind systemd, and he has now moved to a job within Microsoft. What's your point? That doesn't mean systemd is Microsoft property now. That's not how it works lol. PulseAudio isn't either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dukatos@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nothing you wrote is true. Google Lennart Poettering. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Actually, 100% of what I said is true. Let's go through it together Microsoft does not own systemd True. The closest thing to an "owner" the project has would be Red Hat (not owned by MS), but it's had over 2000 authors in its time. And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it True. This in fact happens already. Lots of distros that use systemd only use some components of it. It's GPL code, you can do that... Now let's move on to Lennart Poettering. Yeah, he was one of the top people behind systemd, and he has now moved to a job within Microsoft. What's your point? That doesn't mean systemd is Microsoft property now. That's not how it works lol. PulseAudio isn't either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Actually, 100% of what I said is true. Let's go through it together Microsoft does not own systemd True. The closest thing to an "owner" the project has would be Red Hat (not owned by MS), but it's had over 2000 authors in its time. And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it True. This in fact happens already. Lots of distros that use systemd only use some components of it. It's GPL code, you can do that... Now let's move on to Lennart Poettering. Yeah, he was one of the top people behind systemd, and he has now moved to a job within Microsoft. What's your point? That doesn't mean systemd is Microsoft property now. That's not how it works lol. PulseAudio isn't either. permalink fedilink source parent