450
YouTube tests removing viewer counts — here’s what we know (www.tomsguide.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

It's currently a race-to-the-bottom in big IT & tech, where they don't look how they get you to like them but how much they can get away with, without repelling most of their userbase.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    In this case YouTube can do literally anything they want due to the lack of real alternatives. Hosting videos for free, for anyone (and any number of viewers) to watch, for free, is rather predictably not a very profitable business model. If you want to see what it takes to actually be profitable with such a model, look at the average free porn site. Extremely intrusive ads everywhere. If you don't want to pay, and ads are the only revenue, advertisers are the customer, not you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent