▲ 192 ▼ Sysadmins slam Apple’s SSL/TLS cert lifespan cuts (www.theregister.com) submitted 2 years ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world 81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago (8 children) spending $300 every 90 days instead of 365 days is so much better /s i hate apple so much permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pixely@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (6 children) Who is buying SSL certs for $300? Is this an enterprise thing? I’m using free certs on AWS. LetsEncrypt is also fine for self-hosting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (4 children) It is an enterprise thing, yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (3 children) $300 sounds ok for an enterprise thing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's more of an issue when it's every 90 days. Even worse is the labor cost to replace the certificate on everything that needs it every 90 days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pixely@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are these genuinely being hand rolled in an enterprise environment? Unless it’s completely impossible to automate then I can’t be sympathetic to companies that are just doing it wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's way more than 300 if you want all the bells and whistles and many SANs even permalink fedilink source parent [+] lud@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pixely@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (6 children) Who is buying SSL certs for $300? Is this an enterprise thing? I’m using free certs on AWS. LetsEncrypt is also fine for self-hosting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (4 children) It is an enterprise thing, yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (3 children) $300 sounds ok for an enterprise thing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's more of an issue when it's every 90 days. Even worse is the labor cost to replace the certificate on everything that needs it every 90 days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pixely@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are these genuinely being hand rolled in an enterprise environment? Unless it’s completely impossible to automate then I can’t be sympathetic to companies that are just doing it wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's way more than 300 if you want all the bells and whistles and many SANs even permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (4 children) It is an enterprise thing, yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (3 children) $300 sounds ok for an enterprise thing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's more of an issue when it's every 90 days. Even worse is the labor cost to replace the certificate on everything that needs it every 90 days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pixely@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are these genuinely being hand rolled in an enterprise environment? Unless it’s completely impossible to automate then I can’t be sympathetic to companies that are just doing it wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago (3 children) $300 sounds ok for an enterprise thing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's more of an issue when it's every 90 days. Even worse is the labor cost to replace the certificate on everything that needs it every 90 days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pixely@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are these genuinely being hand rolled in an enterprise environment? Unless it’s completely impossible to automate then I can’t be sympathetic to companies that are just doing it wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's more of an issue when it's every 90 days. Even worse is the labor cost to replace the certificate on everything that needs it every 90 days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pixely@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are these genuinely being hand rolled in an enterprise environment? Unless it’s completely impossible to automate then I can’t be sympathetic to companies that are just doing it wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pixely@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are these genuinely being hand rolled in an enterprise environment? Unless it’s completely impossible to automate then I can’t be sympathetic to companies that are just doing it wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago There's lots of equipment that can't accept certificates automatically. If they can, it might be in a closed off way that's difficult to impossible to reverse engineer. If you can, that's still a lot of skill and labor, which drives up the cost. They also might find out that it would be insecure to do it automatically. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It's way more than 300 if you want all the bells and whistles and many SANs even permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lud@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent