▲ 1003 ▼ Lemmy total number of users last month (very close to 1.5 M users) (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by mesamunefire@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 189 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) I'm unclear what that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) You could decentralize user accounts so that they aren't attached to any instance, or at least the account owner can move their account from one instance to another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) This would be way easier to implement without blockchain. Data portability doesn't require any of the consensus mechanisms or distributed computation, even if they would result in user data being portable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) I'm unclear what that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) You could decentralize user accounts so that they aren't attached to any instance, or at least the account owner can move their account from one instance to another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) This would be way easier to implement without blockchain. Data portability doesn't require any of the consensus mechanisms or distributed computation, even if they would result in user data being portable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) You could decentralize user accounts so that they aren't attached to any instance, or at least the account owner can move their account from one instance to another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) This would be way easier to implement without blockchain. Data portability doesn't require any of the consensus mechanisms or distributed computation, even if they would result in user data being portable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) This would be way easier to implement without blockchain. Data portability doesn't require any of the consensus mechanisms or distributed computation, even if they would result in user data being portable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
