this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
374 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

60062 readers
4395 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
374
Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants (www.cio.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Flying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The more people using chatgpt to generate low quality code they don't understand, the more job safety and greater salary I get.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

As far as I know, right now the main problem with flying cars is that they are nowhere near as idiot-proof as a normal car, and don't really solve any transportation problem since most countries' air regulations agencies would require them to exclusively take off and land in airports... Where you can usually find tons of planes that can go much further (and are much more cost effective, as you pointed out)