you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 93 points 2 years ago (2 children)

For me, it is a glorified auto-complete function. Could definitely live without it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Same for me, but that glorified auto complete helps a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Hell yea. Our unit test coverage went way up because you can blow through test creation in second. I had a large complicated migration from one data set to another with specific mutations based on weird rules and GPT got me 80% of the way there and with a little nudging basically got it perfect. Code that would've taken a few hours took about 6 prompts. If I'm curious about a new library I can get a working example right away to see how everything fits together. When these articles say there's no benefit I feel people aren't using these tools or don't know how to use them effectively.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it's useful, you just gotta keep it on a short leash, which is difficult when you don't know what you're doing

    Basically, it's a useful tool for experienced developers that know what to look out for

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    We always have to ask what language is it auto-completing for? If it is a strictly typed language, then existing tooling is already doing everything possible and I see no need for additional improvement. If it is non-strictly typed language, then I can see how it can get a little more helpful, but without knowledge of actual context I am not sure if it can get a lot more accurate.

  • source
  • parent