▲ 1346 ▼ OpenAI Execs Mass Quit as Company Removes Control From Non-Profit Board and Hands It to Sam Altman (futurism.com) submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world 235 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 121 points 2 years ago (2 children) They should be required to change their name permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 109 points 2 years ago* (2 children) It's amusing. Meta's AI team is more open than "Open"AI ever was - they publish so many research papers for free, and the latest versions of Llama are very capable models that you can run on your own hardware (if it's powerful enough) for free as long as you don't use it in an app with more than 700 million monthly users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] merari42@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's the famous "As long as your not Google, Amazon or Apple" licence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jdeath@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems like a decent license idea to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Everything should be licensed like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago Needs Microsoft added to the list. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's because Facebook is selling your data and access to advertise to you. The better AI gets across the board, the more money they make. AI isn't the product, you are. OpenAI makes money off selling AI to others. AI is the product, not you. The fact facebook release more code, in this instance, isn't a good thing. It's a reminder how fucked we all are because they make so much off our personal data they can afford to give away literally BILLIONS of dollars in IP. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Facebook doesn't sell your data, nor does Google. That's a common misconception. They sell your attention. Advertisers can show ads to people based on some targeting criteria, but they never see any user data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) They may also sell the data. I bet the NSA backdoor isn't free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) SkyNet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lando55@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please take no offense in this, I will probably not use your name suggestions, SatansMaggotyCumFart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I’m deeply offended. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean killer robots from the future could solve many problems. I can elaborate, but you're going to have to think 4th dimensionally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan@upvote.au 109 points 2 years ago* (2 children) It's amusing. Meta's AI team is more open than "Open"AI ever was - they publish so many research papers for free, and the latest versions of Llama are very capable models that you can run on your own hardware (if it's powerful enough) for free as long as you don't use it in an app with more than 700 million monthly users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] merari42@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's the famous "As long as your not Google, Amazon or Apple" licence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jdeath@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems like a decent license idea to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Everything should be licensed like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago Needs Microsoft added to the list. permalink fedilink source parent [–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's because Facebook is selling your data and access to advertise to you. The better AI gets across the board, the more money they make. AI isn't the product, you are. OpenAI makes money off selling AI to others. AI is the product, not you. The fact facebook release more code, in this instance, isn't a good thing. It's a reminder how fucked we all are because they make so much off our personal data they can afford to give away literally BILLIONS of dollars in IP. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Facebook doesn't sell your data, nor does Google. That's a common misconception. They sell your attention. Advertisers can show ads to people based on some targeting criteria, but they never see any user data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) They may also sell the data. I bet the NSA backdoor isn't free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merari42@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's the famous "As long as your not Google, Amazon or Apple" licence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jdeath@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems like a decent license idea to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Everything should be licensed like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago Needs Microsoft added to the list. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) which seems like a decent license idea to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Everything should be licensed like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago Needs Microsoft added to the list. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Everything should be licensed like that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago Needs Microsoft added to the list. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago Needs Microsoft added to the list. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's because Facebook is selling your data and access to advertise to you. The better AI gets across the board, the more money they make. AI isn't the product, you are. OpenAI makes money off selling AI to others. AI is the product, not you. The fact facebook release more code, in this instance, isn't a good thing. It's a reminder how fucked we all are because they make so much off our personal data they can afford to give away literally BILLIONS of dollars in IP. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Facebook doesn't sell your data, nor does Google. That's a common misconception. They sell your attention. Advertisers can show ads to people based on some targeting criteria, but they never see any user data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) They may also sell the data. I bet the NSA backdoor isn't free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Facebook doesn't sell your data, nor does Google. That's a common misconception. They sell your attention. Advertisers can show ads to people based on some targeting criteria, but they never see any user data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) They may also sell the data. I bet the NSA backdoor isn't free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) They may also sell the data. I bet the NSA backdoor isn't free. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions. Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) SkyNet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lando55@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please take no offense in this, I will probably not use your name suggestions, SatansMaggotyCumFart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I’m deeply offended. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean killer robots from the future could solve many problems. I can elaborate, but you're going to have to think 4th dimensionally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lando55@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please take no offense in this, I will probably not use your name suggestions, SatansMaggotyCumFart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I’m deeply offended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I’m deeply offended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean killer robots from the future could solve many problems. I can elaborate, but you're going to have to think 4th dimensionally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure. permalink fedilink source parent