▲ 550 ▼ NIST proposes barring some of the most nonsensical password rules (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by Amicitas@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments Here is the text of the NIST sp800-63b Digital Identity Guidelines.
[+] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) That works great until some dickhole implements the old, "New password cannot contain any sequence from your previous (5) passwords." This also of course necessitates storing (multiple successive!) passwords in plain text or with a reversible cipher, which is another stupid move. You'd think we'd have gotten all of this out of our collective system as a society by now, and yet I still see it all the time. All of these schemes are just security theater, and actively make the system in question less secure while accomplishing nothing other than berating and frustrating its users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] dgmib@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* This also leads to stupid rules like you can’t change your password more than once a day, to prevent someone from changing their password 5 times and then changing it back to what it was before. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* "I just increment the number at the end" is a phrase I've heard so many times permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) That works great until some dickhole implements the old, "New password cannot contain any sequence from your previous (5) passwords." This also of course necessitates storing (multiple successive!) passwords in plain text or with a reversible cipher, which is another stupid move. You'd think we'd have gotten all of this out of our collective system as a society by now, and yet I still see it all the time. All of these schemes are just security theater, and actively make the system in question less secure while accomplishing nothing other than berating and frustrating its users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] dgmib@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* This also leads to stupid rules like you can’t change your password more than once a day, to prevent someone from changing their password 5 times and then changing it back to what it was before. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* This also leads to stupid rules like you can’t change your password more than once a day, to prevent someone from changing their password 5 times and then changing it back to what it was before. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* "I just increment the number at the end" is a phrase I've heard so many times permalink fedilink source parent