▲ 929 ▼ Palworld maker vows to fight Nintendo lawsuit on behalf of fans and indie developers (www.eurogamer.net) submitted 2 years ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world 356 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (4 children) This is a patent lawsuit, not copyright permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (3 children) even worse. software patents are just more idiotic copyrights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Might be about a design patent permalink fedilink source parent [–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dunno, I think I prefer patents. Unlike copyright, patents usually last a flat twenty years. Copyright expires either after 95 years or 70 years after the death of the author, which is ludicrous. Both are constantly abused, but at least patents expire in a reasonable amount of time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago patents and copyright are pretty different though. IMO both are bad but you can at least make a case for protecting intelectual work from copying. Patents protect replication of ideas and ideas don't have to be unique at all. If I say it was my idea to call variables a,b,c,d,e in that order that means anyone who wants to do that in their creations needs my permission which is fucking bonkers. I'm convinced that software patents exist purely for regulatory capture. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (3 children) even worse. software patents are just more idiotic copyrights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Might be about a design patent permalink fedilink source parent [–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dunno, I think I prefer patents. Unlike copyright, patents usually last a flat twenty years. Copyright expires either after 95 years or 70 years after the death of the author, which is ludicrous. Both are constantly abused, but at least patents expire in a reasonable amount of time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago patents and copyright are pretty different though. IMO both are bad but you can at least make a case for protecting intelectual work from copying. Patents protect replication of ideas and ideas don't have to be unique at all. If I say it was my idea to call variables a,b,c,d,e in that order that means anyone who wants to do that in their creations needs my permission which is fucking bonkers. I'm convinced that software patents exist purely for regulatory capture. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Might be about a design patent permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Dunno, I think I prefer patents. Unlike copyright, patents usually last a flat twenty years. Copyright expires either after 95 years or 70 years after the death of the author, which is ludicrous. Both are constantly abused, but at least patents expire in a reasonable amount of time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago patents and copyright are pretty different though. IMO both are bad but you can at least make a case for protecting intelectual work from copying. Patents protect replication of ideas and ideas don't have to be unique at all. If I say it was my idea to call variables a,b,c,d,e in that order that means anyone who wants to do that in their creations needs my permission which is fucking bonkers. I'm convinced that software patents exist purely for regulatory capture. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago patents and copyright are pretty different though. IMO both are bad but you can at least make a case for protecting intelectual work from copying. Patents protect replication of ideas and ideas don't have to be unique at all. If I say it was my idea to call variables a,b,c,d,e in that order that means anyone who wants to do that in their creations needs my permission which is fucking bonkers. I'm convinced that software patents exist purely for regulatory capture. permalink fedilink source parent