▲ 1241 ▼ Burning Up (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 540 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 177 points 2 years ago (28 children) By that metric, kelvin would be even better though. permalink fedilink source hideshow 28 child comments replies: [–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 158 points 2 years ago (11 children) by that metric Americans cannot understand any metric permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@midwest.social 79 points 2 years ago (3 children) 2 liter bottle. Checkmate, athiests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chipt4@beehaw.org 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) Also we have electric, water and gas meters smh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is why I say 'metre' for the measure and 'meter' for the measurement device permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 years ago And Demeter for the harvest permalink fedilink source parent [–] konalt@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (4 children) 9mm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) We’re more familiar with 5.56x45mm thanks to all our school shootings thank you very much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) In the same way a US ton and a metric ton is like 10% different, a 556 bullet is actually 5.7 mm across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Morphit@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn't make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 2 years ago I would make a bet that more mass shootings are done with 9mm. Depending on which shootings they consider 'mass' I see estimates from 60-80% for handgun usage. I'm sure the cheap .22 is a large number, but 9mm is probably right up there. There is a large bias in reporting the school shootings and shootings involving rifles by the media. They almost ignore the others. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago 28 grams to an ounce permalink fedilink source parent [–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago In point of fact Americans have gotten impressive results out of far more complicated metrics than metric. It's not a matter of understanding, it's a matter of pride. And of not having to buy all new tools. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (9 children) You miss out on screaming that it's negative anything though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Haus@kbin.earth 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) -40F = -40C permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Kelvin doesn't have a negative. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago (5 children) The best system would have 0 at a mild, comfortable temperature, and go up or down by 100 degrees per one degrees Fahrenheit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Mac@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago* (3 children) But mild and comfortable is different for different people who are acclimated to different weather. We need a defined 'mild' temperature. i vote for 70F/21C. It's a bit chilly for the warm weathered folks and a bit warm for the cold weathered folks. Seems reasonable but I'm open to suggestions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago As a cold weathered folk, I can confirm that 70 is my upper limit for nice temperature permalink fedilink source parent [–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* I'd adjust it to 68/20 just so it lines up with whole numbers in both systems. And on second thought, make it 90 per degree Fahrenheit so any whole F or C value can convert to a whole number. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago it needs to be a range, you can't really just have a single point, something like 50f to 70f would be good. Some people like a little below, some people like a little above, the 60s are generally pretty comfy all around though. We also need to consider clothing as well. Which i do in this case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago 0 for freezing because water falls from the fucking sky. permalink fedilink source parent [–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago You can absolutely yell about that. And when Fahrenheit flips to negative, you're ready to express some big feelings about how fucking cold it is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago And Rankine would be even better than Kelvin in terms of "big number go brrr." Water boils at 671 R. Of course, Rankine is the most obnoxious unit I've ever had to deal with, but those numbers sure are big! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago* You mean it's THREE HUNDRED AND FOURTEEN FUCKING DEGREES OUTSIDE?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago OK, but with Rankine, if it's 101 out, you can go Five Hundred and SIXTY degrees??! permalink fedilink source parent [–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please raise this temperature by 1.4x10^-23 Joules - statements of the utterly deranged permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Joules are energy. You need thermal capacity to turn them into temperature. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago “Kelvin” sounds a lot like “communism” you pinko permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 158 points 2 years ago (11 children) by that metric Americans cannot understand any metric permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@midwest.social 79 points 2 years ago (3 children) 2 liter bottle. Checkmate, athiests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chipt4@beehaw.org 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) Also we have electric, water and gas meters smh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is why I say 'metre' for the measure and 'meter' for the measurement device permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 years ago And Demeter for the harvest permalink fedilink source parent [–] konalt@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (4 children) 9mm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) We’re more familiar with 5.56x45mm thanks to all our school shootings thank you very much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) In the same way a US ton and a metric ton is like 10% different, a 556 bullet is actually 5.7 mm across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Morphit@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn't make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 2 years ago I would make a bet that more mass shootings are done with 9mm. Depending on which shootings they consider 'mass' I see estimates from 60-80% for handgun usage. I'm sure the cheap .22 is a large number, but 9mm is probably right up there. There is a large bias in reporting the school shootings and shootings involving rifles by the media. They almost ignore the others. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago 28 grams to an ounce permalink fedilink source parent [–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago In point of fact Americans have gotten impressive results out of far more complicated metrics than metric. It's not a matter of understanding, it's a matter of pride. And of not having to buy all new tools. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 79 points 2 years ago (3 children) 2 liter bottle. Checkmate, athiests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chipt4@beehaw.org 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) Also we have electric, water and gas meters smh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is why I say 'metre' for the measure and 'meter' for the measurement device permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 years ago And Demeter for the harvest permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chipt4@beehaw.org 26 points 2 years ago (2 children) Also we have electric, water and gas meters smh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is why I say 'metre' for the measure and 'meter' for the measurement device permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 years ago And Demeter for the harvest permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is why I say 'metre' for the measure and 'meter' for the measurement device permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 years ago And Demeter for the harvest permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 2 years ago And Demeter for the harvest permalink fedilink source parent
[–] konalt@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (4 children) 9mm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) We’re more familiar with 5.56x45mm thanks to all our school shootings thank you very much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) In the same way a US ton and a metric ton is like 10% different, a 556 bullet is actually 5.7 mm across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Morphit@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn't make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 2 years ago I would make a bet that more mass shootings are done with 9mm. Depending on which shootings they consider 'mass' I see estimates from 60-80% for handgun usage. I'm sure the cheap .22 is a large number, but 9mm is probably right up there. There is a large bias in reporting the school shootings and shootings involving rifles by the media. They almost ignore the others. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) We’re more familiar with 5.56x45mm thanks to all our school shootings thank you very much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) In the same way a US ton and a metric ton is like 10% different, a 556 bullet is actually 5.7 mm across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Morphit@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn't make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 2 years ago I would make a bet that more mass shootings are done with 9mm. Depending on which shootings they consider 'mass' I see estimates from 60-80% for handgun usage. I'm sure the cheap .22 is a large number, but 9mm is probably right up there. There is a large bias in reporting the school shootings and shootings involving rifles by the media. They almost ignore the others. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) In the same way a US ton and a metric ton is like 10% different, a 556 bullet is actually 5.7 mm across. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Morphit@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn't make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn't make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 2 years ago I would make a bet that more mass shootings are done with 9mm. Depending on which shootings they consider 'mass' I see estimates from 60-80% for handgun usage. I'm sure the cheap .22 is a large number, but 9mm is probably right up there. There is a large bias in reporting the school shootings and shootings involving rifles by the media. They almost ignore the others. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago 28 grams to an ounce permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago In point of fact Americans have gotten impressive results out of far more complicated metrics than metric. It's not a matter of understanding, it's a matter of pride. And of not having to buy all new tools. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (9 children) You miss out on screaming that it's negative anything though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Haus@kbin.earth 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) -40F = -40C permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Kelvin doesn't have a negative. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago (5 children) The best system would have 0 at a mild, comfortable temperature, and go up or down by 100 degrees per one degrees Fahrenheit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Mac@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago* (3 children) But mild and comfortable is different for different people who are acclimated to different weather. We need a defined 'mild' temperature. i vote for 70F/21C. It's a bit chilly for the warm weathered folks and a bit warm for the cold weathered folks. Seems reasonable but I'm open to suggestions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago As a cold weathered folk, I can confirm that 70 is my upper limit for nice temperature permalink fedilink source parent [–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* I'd adjust it to 68/20 just so it lines up with whole numbers in both systems. And on second thought, make it 90 per degree Fahrenheit so any whole F or C value can convert to a whole number. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago it needs to be a range, you can't really just have a single point, something like 50f to 70f would be good. Some people like a little below, some people like a little above, the 60s are generally pretty comfy all around though. We also need to consider clothing as well. Which i do in this case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago 0 for freezing because water falls from the fucking sky. permalink fedilink source parent [–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago You can absolutely yell about that. And when Fahrenheit flips to negative, you're ready to express some big feelings about how fucking cold it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Haus@kbin.earth 28 points 2 years ago (1 child) -40F = -40C permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Kelvin doesn't have a negative. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Kelvin doesn't have a negative. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago (5 children) The best system would have 0 at a mild, comfortable temperature, and go up or down by 100 degrees per one degrees Fahrenheit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Mac@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago* (3 children) But mild and comfortable is different for different people who are acclimated to different weather. We need a defined 'mild' temperature. i vote for 70F/21C. It's a bit chilly for the warm weathered folks and a bit warm for the cold weathered folks. Seems reasonable but I'm open to suggestions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago As a cold weathered folk, I can confirm that 70 is my upper limit for nice temperature permalink fedilink source parent [–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* I'd adjust it to 68/20 just so it lines up with whole numbers in both systems. And on second thought, make it 90 per degree Fahrenheit so any whole F or C value can convert to a whole number. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago it needs to be a range, you can't really just have a single point, something like 50f to 70f would be good. Some people like a little below, some people like a little above, the 60s are generally pretty comfy all around though. We also need to consider clothing as well. Which i do in this case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago 0 for freezing because water falls from the fucking sky. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago* (3 children) But mild and comfortable is different for different people who are acclimated to different weather. We need a defined 'mild' temperature. i vote for 70F/21C. It's a bit chilly for the warm weathered folks and a bit warm for the cold weathered folks. Seems reasonable but I'm open to suggestions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago As a cold weathered folk, I can confirm that 70 is my upper limit for nice temperature permalink fedilink source parent [–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* I'd adjust it to 68/20 just so it lines up with whole numbers in both systems. And on second thought, make it 90 per degree Fahrenheit so any whole F or C value can convert to a whole number. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago it needs to be a range, you can't really just have a single point, something like 50f to 70f would be good. Some people like a little below, some people like a little above, the 60s are generally pretty comfy all around though. We also need to consider clothing as well. Which i do in this case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago As a cold weathered folk, I can confirm that 70 is my upper limit for nice temperature permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* I'd adjust it to 68/20 just so it lines up with whole numbers in both systems. And on second thought, make it 90 per degree Fahrenheit so any whole F or C value can convert to a whole number. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago it needs to be a range, you can't really just have a single point, something like 50f to 70f would be good. Some people like a little below, some people like a little above, the 60s are generally pretty comfy all around though. We also need to consider clothing as well. Which i do in this case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago 0 for freezing because water falls from the fucking sky. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago You can absolutely yell about that. And when Fahrenheit flips to negative, you're ready to express some big feelings about how fucking cold it is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago And Rankine would be even better than Kelvin in terms of "big number go brrr." Water boils at 671 R. Of course, Rankine is the most obnoxious unit I've ever had to deal with, but those numbers sure are big! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago* You mean it's THREE HUNDRED AND FOURTEEN FUCKING DEGREES OUTSIDE?! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago OK, but with Rankine, if it's 101 out, you can go Five Hundred and SIXTY degrees??! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Please raise this temperature by 1.4x10^-23 Joules - statements of the utterly deranged permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Joules are energy. You need thermal capacity to turn them into temperature. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Joules are energy. You need thermal capacity to turn them into temperature. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago “Kelvin” sounds a lot like “communism” you pinko permalink fedilink source parent